America's Degenerate Ruling Class and its' "Official Version of Reality"

EPA administrator Gina McCarthy said there is no need to continue debating the science behind climate change:

I can remember a day when the weather report was in the middle of the domestic and international news and took about a minute and a half. It wasn’t the news. When you go on the news today the first thing you’ll hear about is the weather. So there is a dramatic difference in the way people perceive the ability of the climate to impact their lives because they’re feeling it today..."   “I think we need to make it very clear and not continue to debate the science. I think we need to get more people speaking about it than EPA, or NOAA or NASA. I mean, those people are great and looked at as being experts, not necessarily the best at making climate change science personal for people so they understand it..."  (EPA Chief: Climate Change Is Fact Because Bad Weather Leads the News, pjmedia.com)

There is no doubt that the weather is changing.    McCarthy said so. The Orwellian propaganda corps aka " news" for unevolved hominids in the great American fly-over said so, and have large numbers of self-important egoistic stuffed-shirts sporting "We are Official Experts" labels.   So there you have it, the "Official Version of Reality," insidiously crafted and rubber-stamped by Orwellian "experts", which means that refutation of the "Official Reality of Weather Change" is absolutely Not Allowed.

What do all of these "experts" have in common?  The spurious claim of scientific neutrality as an operating assumption.  Two applications of scientific neutrality evidence this: evolution (anti-creation account/relentless change/relativism), an inverted exegesis that deconstructs and reduces man in the spiritual image of the Trinity to evolved hominid, and deconstructionism (destructive criticism/critical theory). Along with evolution, deconstructionism is a form of relativism or nihilism (meaninglessness).

The origin of the neutrality principle is the Garden of Eden. Its' father is the Evil One who tempted Eve to approach the question of eating from the forbidden tree in a neutral, unbiased fashion. He slyly suggested that she adopt a neutral position in order to decide who was right, God or the snake. Like America's scientifically neutral ruling class, Eve doubted and therefore rejected God's Word as authoritative and conclusive. As a true neutralist she determined for herself which choice to take. (Gen. 3:4-6)

The devil's scientific neutrality principle fuels modern revolutionary politics, political correctness (public advocacy of sin) and is therefore the philosophy of violence, lies and license of America's president, his cabinet, and the amoral left-right ruling class of which they are members. It is also the philosophy of the Marquis de Sade, Friedrich Nietzsche, Karl Marx and the Sophist Callicles in Plato's 'Georgias' who declares:

"The fact is this: luxury and licentiousness and liberty, if they have the support of force, are virtue and happiness and the rest of these embellishments – the unnatural covenants of mankind – are all mere stuff and nonsense." (Making Gay Okay, Reilly, pp. 31-32)

In other words, with a consensus of lies backed by power, force and the threat of violence, the Revelation of God, the Christian Church, virtue, immutable truth, traditional marriage, the two created sexes, our children, our humanity, the unborn, our wealth, our homes and businesses, our retirement, our Constitutional rights and even the weather become whatever the devil's lying agents of violence and the mobs in back of them want them to be or not to be from one moment to the next.

Under the soul and culture destroying influence and control of the ruling class America is quickly devolving into a three-tiered fear-based society.  The first two rings consist of an inner ring (an amoral elitist ruling class), and a somewhat larger outer ringconsisting of evil-embracing followers who willingly embrace lies in order to be accepted, privileged, enriched and empowered to persecute, destroy, steal, murder, and hound and blackmail the much larger third ring.   The third ring consists of practical atheists--debauched, submissive double-thinkers and all who actually prefer Egyptian servitude since sating their appetites takes precedence over morally-ordered freedom.  Operating around the outer edges are the dissidents:  people convicted by higher Truth and Moral Law who represent the group most resistant to mind control and slavery.

The real source of evil is the elitist inner circle, a parasitic confederacy of the devil's god-men described by Professor Angelo Codevilla as America’s Ruling Class:

Today’s ruling class, from Boston to San Diego, was formed by an educational system that exposed them to the same ideas and gave them remarkably uniform guidance, as well as tastes and habits. These amount to a social canon of judgments about good and evil, complete with secular sacred history, sins (against minorities and the environment), and saints. Using the right words and avoiding the wrong ones when referring to such matters — speaking the “in” language — serves as a badge of identity. Regardless of what business or profession they are in, their road up included government channels and government money because, as government has grown, its boundary with the rest of American life has become indistinct. Many began their careers in government and leveraged their way into the private sector. Some, e.g., Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, never held a non-government job. Hence whether formally in government, out of it, or halfway, America’s ruling class speaks the language and has the tastes, habits, and tools of bureaucrats. It rules uneasily over the majority of Americans not oriented to government.” (America’s Ruling Class---and the Perils of Revolution, Codevilla, July/Aug. 2010, The American Spectator)

The faith of America’s Ruling Class rests on four pillars of sand.   The three most important  are the neutrality principle, magic science and Gnostic-pagan Darwinism. The fourth, an arrogant assumption of god-like superiority, is enabled and empowered by the first three.  Codevilla summarizes this attitude as “we” are the best and brightest while the rest of Americans are unevolved humanoids, hence,

 “…retrograde, racist, and dysfunctional unless properly constrained.” (ibid)

Despite America’s  pervasive spiritual, moral, and intellectual pathology most Americans still retain faith in God (more or less) thus some sense of right and wrong, while the  Ruling Class are psychopaths, moral imbeciles given over to reprobate minds who view themselves as gods.  How did this sick, twisted god-man attitude replace the Founding generation’s belief that “all men are created equal” because they are the spiritual image bearers of the living, personal Holy Triune God?  Codevilla writes that by the 1820s,

“… J. C. Calhoun was reading in the best London journals that different breeds of animals and plants produce inferior or superior results, slave owners were citing the Negroes’ deficiencies to argue that they should remain slaves indefinitely. Lots of others were reading Ludwig Feuerbach’s rendition of Hegelian philosophy, according to which biblical injunctions reflect the fantasies of alienated human beings or, in the young Karl Marx’s formulation, that ethical thought is “superstructural” to material reality. By 1853, when Sen. John Pettit of Ohio called “all men are created equal” “a self-evident lie,” much of America’s educated class had already absorbed the “scientific” notion (which Darwin only popularized) that man is the product of chance mutation and natural selection of the fittest. Accordingly, by nature, superior men subdue inferior ones as they subdue lower beings or try to improve them as they please….As the 19th century ended, the educated class’s religious fervor turned to social reform: they were sure that because man is a mere part of evolutionary nature, man could be improved, and that they, the most highly evolved of all, were the improvers.” (ibid)

As their numbers grew and their narcissism inflated,

“… so did their distaste for common Americans. Believing itself “scientific,” this Progressive class sought to explain its differences from its neighbors in “scientific” terms. The most elaborate of these attempts was Theodor Adorno’s widely acclaimed The Authoritarian Personality (1948). It invented a set of criteria by which to define personality traits, ranked these traits and their intensity in any given person on what it called the “F scale” (F for fascist), interviewed hundreds of Americans, and concluded that most who were not liberal Democrats were latent fascists. This way of thinking about non-Progressives filtered down to college curricula. In 1963-64 for example, I was assigned Herbert McCloskey’s Conservatism and Personality (1958) at Rutgers’s Eagleton Institute of Politics as a paradigm of methodological correctness. The author had defined conservatism in terms of answers to certain questions, had defined a number of personality disorders in terms of other questions, and run a survey that proved “scientifically” that conservatives were maladjusted ne’er-do-well ignoramuses. “(ibid)  

Far from being the rational, scientifically enlightened, forward-thinking free-thinkers they imagine themselves to be, America’s Ruling Class are magical-thinking reprobates.   Respected Conservative Christian writer Frederick J. Hutchinson connects magical thinking with narcissism.  These two sins go together like a dung-beetle on its’ pile.

 Hutchinson characterizes magical thinking with the ridiculous proverb that if a tree falls in a forest and no one hears it, it makes no noise, meaning that if a narcissist did not see or hear the tree fall then it did not fall since whatever the narcissist imagines, covets, envies, hates, or lusts after is the absolute meaning of reality at any given moment.  By extension of this insanity, if a narcissist hates God the Father then He does not exist, if he worships science and evolution then so must we all, and if he says climate change is real then we must accept it as real. (Restoring History, Hutchinson, pp. 80-81)

According to the highly respected pastor John McArthur, the Lord God Almighty has given most if not all of the ruling class over to reprobate minds. This means that though their intellects are intact, with their consciences given over to depravity, their reason is warped and inverted, thus useless for the pursuit of virtue.  They are spiritually dead, their materialized souls turned inward away from God and His Light into the darkness and infinite smallness of ‘self-absorbed self’ hence their wills are turned to wickedness.

This is why the Ruling Class make common cause with terrorists and other evil-doers and constantly advance deceptions like science magic (scientism), evolution as a fact of science, and climate change.   And because they hate the “retrograde, racist, and dysfunctional” masses in the great flyover zones of America, especially those in the Bible Belt,  they sympathetically  support bogus “new” rights such as choice, euthanasia, universal sodomy, ‘gay’ marriage, perverse sex-education, universal healthcare, and Sharia because in reality all of these bogus ‘rights’ ultimately unleash forces of destruction upon the hated masses in one way or another.

From the Renaissance to our own time, every step of the systematic downfall of Christendom and Protestant America has been led by arrogant, defiant God-hating narcissists who have deliberately fostered hedonism, lawlessness, narcissism, an entitlement mentality, and other evils  among Americans so that today evil is at epidemic proportions at every level of society.

Dr. Carl Raschke is an internationally known writer and academic scholar who for the past decade has been researching and explaining the effects of America’s apostasy from God and its’ corollary, narcissism and magical thinking, which Raschke combines into what he calls a Satanist Mindset.  This mindset is a mystification of the most corrupt passions and inverted values of magical thinkers.   It is the spiritual Frankenstein,

“…created by a social order that has attempted to sustain itself without God.” (Satanism and Witchcraft: The Occult and the West, Dr. John Ankerberg and Dr. John Weldon)

 A Satanic Mindset has gained a virtual chokehold on the levers of power and influence from the White House to Hollywood, academia, certain corporations, the media, the Supreme Court, Congress, and apostatizing seminaries and pulpits.

While our Satanically-minded Ruling Class see the signs of corruption and insanity over-spreading our nation as signs of progress, some Americans choose to turn a blind eye and deaf ear to what is going on while still others foresee only disaster.  Ex-atheist Alexander Solzhenitsyn however, holds out hope, our only hope,  to a weary, spiritually disconsolate people.  In his 1983 Templeton Prize address, “Men Have Forgotten God,” he stated,

All attempts to find a way out of the plight of today’s world are fruitless unless we redirect our consciousness, in repentance, to the Creator of all; without this, no exit will be illumined, and we shall seek it in vain.”

@Linda Kimball

Losing Our Hearts and Souls to the Science-Magic Mythos

In his classic book, “The Abolition of Man,” C.S. Lewis characterized science and magic as twins,

“….the serious magical endeavor and the serious scientific endeavor are twins.” (p. 87)

In an age characterized by science worship and sweeping evolutionary thinking, Lewis’s observation doubtless seems strange, but the comparison between science and magic runs throughout a number of his most popular works.  In Lewis’s Narnian tale “The Magician’s Nephew” the sinister Uncle Andrew is both a magician and a scientist while the corrupt progressive conspirators at the National Institute of Co-ordinated Experiments (N.I.C.E.) in “That Hideous Strength,” the third and last installment of Lewis’s space trilogy crave the powers of both science and magic in their plot to re-engineer man and society.

Lewis understood that science and magic are alarmingly similar.  On one hand, science magic and evolution (metaphysical sophistry) have the ability to function as a religion that inculcates a lack of skepticism resulting in unthinking devotion and worship.  On the other, mindless devotion and obedience gives science magic its’ power over the minds and souls of men, thereby allowinghigh priests of scientism to dominate the Christian Church and society.

Lewis was not against ‘good’ science, meaning science in search of truth, but rather against the magic-science ushered in by Darwin whose Godless theory provided potent fuel for turning science into a neo-pagan religion.  In his book “Miracles” he argued that the birth of ‘good’ science depended on the Judeo-Christian view of the living, personal God, the Author of Moral Law and Law in Nature, the Creator who, though He upholds all life and nonlife within the cosmos nevertheless exists outside of the space-time dimension,

Men became scientific because they expected Law in Nature, and they expected Law in Nature because they believed in a Legislator.”  (p. 106)

In Lewis’s lifetime, the promoter par excellence of magic-science and evolution as an alternative cosmogony to the Genesis account ex nihilo and the Revealed Word in general was popular writer H.G. Wells.  Wells and fellow travelers fashioned Darwin’s philosophically materialist theory of evolution into a powerfully seductive cosmic creation mythos, a strange fire that satanically inverts the order of creation and reverses the direction of Biblical theism.  Lewis variously called this new mythos “The Scientific Outlook,” and “Evolutionism” and added that with dramatic storytellers such as Wells propounding it the mythos would surely capture the minds of men and transform their consciousness with its grand, unfolding narrative brimful of heroism, pathos and tragedy.

In this grand unfolding narrative, history and self-created life magically progress upward from non-living chemicals to cave-dwelling ape-men, then to animism and polytheism followed by monotheism, the stage during which primitive humanoids invented gods, ethics and other superstitions.  After monotheism the narrative ascends to higher-order reason, science and knowledge of evolution, which finally liberated men from the gods and other superstitions they had invented in their distant primitive past.

So complete has the transformation of consciousness been that vast numbers of Christian clergy and laypeople no longer trust the unevolved cognitive abilities of “primitive” men like Abraham, Isaac, and Moses, nor for that matter, the OT prophets.    As primitive and superstitious as they were, they cannot be trusted to understand anything God revealed to them, if in fact He spoke at all.   The consequences of this abiding skepticism are stark and terrible, resulting in atheism, agnosticism and pagan hermeneutics.

In the Breakpoint commentary, “He has Spoken: Replacing Pagan Hermeneutics,” Eric Metaxas observes that even though modern Christians are generally still attached to their Bibles their handling of it is pagan.   By this he means that the Bible is for such people nothing more than a collection of heart-warming stories or encouraging proverbs: 

We conveniently ignore the claims it makes on us, which is why so many of us live like pagans in our daily lives.” (breakpoint.org, September 12, 2013)

For Metaxas as for so many concerned Christian thinkers within the whole body of the Church, the most important question is, “what if anything can be done about the ongoing loss of faith?”

As atheism, agnosticism and pagan hermeneutics are powered by the science-magic and evolution mythos responsible for inverting creation, then one answer is to analyze and ultimately dismantle and destroy the myth, beginning with the findings of the eminent researcher of antiquity, James Baily.  In his book, “The God-Kings and the Titans: The New World Ascendancy in Ancient Times” Baily destroys the inverted creation account of the mythos, which he calls the reverse of facts:

“…human history can now be hesitantly traced back as an unbroken narrative to 4000 B.C….the picture emerging…is one of the Fall of Man in historic terms as well as his rise; it is a picture…more of degradation than of success; it is a picture of monotheism breaking down into polytheism and of the struggle to return to monotheism.  The establishment view of the history of religion gradually progressing from animism to polytheism (then) to monotheism is the reverse of facts.” (1973, p. 296)   

In other words, 4000 years before Christ, there was Noah and his family in the post-flood world.  According to the highly esteemed historian Samuel Shuckford, Noah and his family brought with them the knowledge of God, Creation, origin of man, the Deluge,  sacrifice to God for the propitiation of sin, as well as the knowledge of letters/symbols, architecture, science, agriculture, and much else.   (The Sacred and Profane History of the World Connected, 1808)

Noah remained in the East and established the worship of the true God.  Shuckford writes that Noah was undoubtedly the very first king of China, Fohi, who according to Chinese lore had no father.   According to Shuckford, the East was at that time the most advanced civilization in terms of learning, medicine, true religion, and much else.

Eighty years after the Flood, Noah’s son Ham and his sons together with other family members eventually settled in the plains of Shinar where they resolved to build a tower, a monument to their own vanity, ambition and rebellion against God. But said Shuckford, God confounded their language in the midst of their undertaking, and caused them “to separate from one another.” (ibid, p.94)

Eventually Ham was deified and worshipped as the gods Chronus I and Jupiter:

 "Ham is represented by many writers as a very wicked, immodest, and profligate creature: Berosus (i) makes him a magician, and to be the same with Zoroast or Zoroastres, and speaks of him as the public corrupter of mankind; and says that he taught men to live as before the flood, to lie with mothers, sisters, daughters, males and brutes, and creatures of all sorts; and that he actually did so himself, and therefore was cast out by his father Janus, or Noah, and got the name of "Chem", the infamous and immodest: (upon seeing his father's nakedness Ham) told his two brethren without; he went out of the tent after he had pleased himself with the sight... and in a wanton, ludicrous, and scoffing manner, related what he had seen: some of the Jewish Rabbins (k), as Jarchi relates, say that Canaan first saw it, and told his father of it; and some say (l), that he or Ham committed an unnatural crime with him; and others (m), that he castrated him; and hence, it is supposed, came the stories of Jupiter castrating his father Saturn, and Chronus his father Uranus."    Genesis 9:22 Gill's Exposition

Ham's son Mizraim was worshipped as Chronus II and the Sun-god Osiris.  Three of Mizraim’s sons, Ananim, Naphtuhim, and Pathrusim became kings in Egypt.

Pathrusim was king of Thebais; his Egyptian name was Tyoth or Thoth.  Also known as Taautus, his Greek name was Hermes and he was worshipped as the Sun-god Mercury.  It was Thoth-Hermes who instructed his brothers in the arts and science magic, such as alchemy or transmutation (evolution) of one kind of thing into another, of which he was master: the Hermetic principle of the macrocosm’s correlation with the microcosm: “As above, so below” symbolized by the serpent-powered Ouroboros, the cosmic tree of life or with Darwin the tree of life. (Luciferian Occultism Overtaking the West: Serpent Power in Ancient and Modern Evolutionary Expressions, http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/kimball/130627)

 Lewis was right to fear the seductive powers of science-magic and evolution.  From its inception it has captured the minds and souls of large numbers of faithless priests and millions of Westerners and Americans, their faith and eternal salvation lost in favor of a useless myth, a strange fire in the minds of men.    But for those with ears to hear and a willing heart, truth will set them free.

@Linda Kimball