The Obama administration is deliberately dividing people into victim-groups and pitting one against the other “to create strife” in society, said Rev. Rafael Cruz, who added that this is a strategy President Obama adopted from left-wing activist Saul Alinsky, who dedicated his infamous book, Rules for Radicals, to “Lucifer.”
“What happened in Ferguson, [Missouri], what happened in those other places is that this administration wants to create strife...” “The whole concept of social justice is all about dividing everybody into a series of smaller groups, make every group seem like a victim and just put one group against the other,” he said. “They are trying to create this strife -- because you have to realize that Obama is a student of Saul Alinsky.” (Rev. Cruz: ‘This Administration Wants to Create Strife … Obama Is a Student of Saul Alinsky,' Michael Chapman, CNSNews.com, November 25, 2015)
What Leftists and their progressive comrades, both theological and secular hope to achieve through the deliberate and malicious pitting of one group against another is the emergence of a single world order slated to arise from the smoldering ashes of the hated Biblically grounded old order. They believe that a scientifically orchestrated global order can be brought about through the universal implementation of Hegel's Dialectic process.
In 1947 Julian Huxley, the head of UNESCO, wrote a book entitled, "UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy." His book was a blueprint for an evolutionary pantheist New World Order that called for a single 'new' spirituality: a mixture of ancient wisdom traditions, magic science, occult Eastern pantheism, reincarnation and karma; Liberal 'pantheist' Christianity and its' primary doctrine evolution; Gnostic paganism, international Luciferian Masonry and Theosophy and other occult traditions. There would also be one language, and one way of thinking. He believed a global order could be brought about through the universal implementation of Hegel's Dialectic process. Huxley said,
"The task before UNESCO...is to help the emergence of a single world culture with its own philosophy and background of ideas and with its own broad purpose."
Huxley spoke of two opposing worldviews, one founded on the Word of God and supernatural creation ex nihilo and the other on pantheistic evolutionism. These two worldviews confronted each other from the West and the East. In describing them he said,
"You may categorize the two philosophies as...individualism versus collectivism or as the American versus the Russian...or as capitalism versus communism, or as Christianity versus Marxism. Can these opposites be reconciled, this antithesis be resolved in a higher synthesis? I believe...this can happen...through the inexorable dialectic of evolution." (crossroad.to/quotes/globalism/Julian-Huxley)
The concept of dialectics has been around for a long time. In the American Dictionary of the English Language, 1828, Noah Webster defined dialectics as:
"That branch of logic which teaches the rules and modes of reasoning."
Simply stated, dialectics refers to 'position' versus 'opposition' or 'thesis' versus 'antithesis,' or 'truth' versus 'falsehood.' By the traditional rules of conduct, if thesis is correct then it follows logically that antithesis is incorrect. Georg Hegel, a master magician in the occult Hermetic tradition discarded the rules and turned the concept upside-down by equalizing thesis and antithesis resulting in relativism. 'New truth,' a merging of truth and falsehood and/or evolutionary pantheism and supernatural Christian theism for example, is now found in something called 'synthesis,' or 'consensus,' the favored vernacular of God-hating Leftists ('new' Gnostic pagan elites).
Hegelian Dialectic is a perfect example of what J. Budziszewski, the author of "What We Can't Not Know" terms the "black magic spells of imposture and unraveling." Hegel's form of dialectics is an impostor. Its’ devilish purpose is to deceptively unravel true truth and norms and then replace them with 'new truth' which is yet another impostor.
Hegel's Dialectics is the strange fire fueling the weapon of mass destruction unwittingly wielded by mind-conditioned and manipulated Americans and Westerners on behalf of transnational occult New Agers and fellow travelers in their war against the West's traditional Christian-based worldview and cultural infrastructure. Called "group dynamics" or the "consensus process," Hegel's dialectic is a psychological behavior and belief modification technique used with great success by Vietnamese communists against American POWs and by Chinese communists against dissidents.
The foundation and key strategy of the consensus process is the knowledge that all people have an inherent fear of being alienated from the group. During sensitivity and diversity-training sessions, skillful change-agents (facilitators) psychologically manipulate this fear to herd selected victims toward a preplanned conclusion that induces them to compromise both conscience and position. This is the consensus process in a nut shell, and when we hear Progressives, Liberals and Leftists screaming for 'consensus,' they're really demanding that they be allowed to 'facilitate' the compromise of conscience which leads to the abandonment of Christian-based Western ideals, principles and traditions.
There are three steps to the consensus process: "Unfreezing the present level, moving to the new level, and freezing group life on the new level." In order to speed up the unfreezing phase, communists resorted to physical torture, shock 'therapy,' mind-altering drugs and other brutal techniques. In America, emotional pain, intimidation, and fear are precipitated by way of threats of shunning and vicious psychological bullying in myriad forms: sadistic ridicule, cruel character assassination, destructive criticism, accusations of stupidity and insanity; labeling (i.e., homophobe, bigot, anti-science idiot), spreading lies, and emotional blackmail. Until total control is achieved, psychological bullying will remain the preferred method.
There are four key elements necessary for a successful 'consensus process' operation. They are:
- Multicultural and/or diverse groups: teenagers, 'gays,' atheists, Wiccans, illegals, or Muslims for instance, fueled by resentment and envy — necessary for causing social conflict
- A traditional religious, social or cultural issue around which conflict can be created. For example, Special Creation, Christmas, traditional marriage, and male-female sex norms and traditional hymns in favor of rock: "Primitive people dance themselves into a frenzy to such music, often ending in sexual orgies" There is a kind of music which uplifts and a kind which destroys all that is good and drags people down
- These are demonized as anti-science, 'unfair, insane, exclusionary, insensitive, intolerant, racist, homophobic, and hurtful' to diverse groups.
- The illusory dialoguing to consensus process.
- The predetermined outcome. For example: Special Creation rejected in favor of evolutionary conceptions, hymns in favor of soft rock, Christmas parades successfully recast as "Festival of Lights" or "Winter Holiday;" sodomy, bestiality, pedophilia, pederasty, and incest recast as normal and worthy of being taught to our children; and traditional marriage compromised by 'gay' unions.
The consensus process has been so successful at unraveling and diminishing the West's traditional culture that here in America for example, evolutionary conceptions now dominate our culture at every level of society and increasingly embraced by theologians while prayers have been banned from government on all levels as well as from schools and increasingly from public areas. Faithful Christians have lost their jobs, been jailed, and their children harassed and even suspended for daring to express their Christian beliefs in any way. Anti-Christian bigotry has become so bad that John Gibson observed,
"There is this kind of casual and accepted bias against Christians and Christian symbols." (The War on Christmas: How the Liberal Plot to Ban the Sacred Christian Holiday is Worse Than You Thought, John Gibson).
Devilish manipulators concur:
"We have battled in America since the century's turn to bring to nothing...all Christian influences and we are succeeding. You must work until officials of city, county, and state will not think twice before they pounce upon religious groups as public enemies. (there must) be a...foaming hatred of religion...a belief that Christian practice is vicious, bad, insanity causing, publicly hated and intolerable." (Red Communist Textbook on Psychopolitics, Laventi Beria, Stalin's right-hand man)
"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology. Its importance has been...increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russell
John Gibson asked a Eugene, Oregon city manager why he had banned Christmas trees. His politically correct mind-conformed response, "Well, because they're Christian." This manager and millions of other Americans testify to the enormous success thus far achieved through nation-wide dumbing-down and psychological bullying. Having been "unfrozen" from the level whereon America's traditional worldview resides and successfully 'moved' to the desired level and then 'frozen' there, the mind-conditioned now serve their new masters evil desires by mindlessly destroying the source of both their liberties, personhood and human worth — supernatural Christian theism.
"Oh but, Christianity has nothing to do with either the founding of our nation or with our rights and freedoms," proclaim mind-conditioned scoffers, doubters, atheists, and skeptics both here in America and throughout the West. The truth however has been 'hiding' in full view, but because their minds are darkened by black magic spells and their eyes made sightless by black magic dust, the mind-conditioned cannot see Truth even when it looks them in the face. In boasting of his clever blueprint, Huxley for example, unwittingly 'confessed' the truth when he said of the two opposing philosophies,
"You may categorize the two philosophies as...Christianity versus Marxism."
Note: This article was originally published in 2005. This is an updated version.