Modern Liberals: Dangerously Insane Revolutionaries from the Void

In "Who Is Winning the Gun War?" Pat Buchanan observes that after the bombing of the Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City America's liberals blamed Rush Limbaugh.  After the murder of six innocents," including a 9-year-old girl, and the wounding of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and a dozen others in Tucson, Ariz., by a certifiable lunatic,"  Sarah Palin was charged with moral complicity and after the "slaughter of 20 first-graders at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn.,"  blame was laid at the feet of the National Rifle Association. (, April 12, 2013)

That liberals are very seriously morally and mentally unbalanced is obvious.  Ex-liberal Evan Sayet  agrees and writes that to say they are,

"...morally and intellectually retarded at the level of the five-year-old child, it is not hyperbole: it's a diagnosis."   (         

If they weren’t so dangerous and destructive said Sayet,

"... one could smile and pat the Modern Liberal on the head and tell him how cute he is and go on about the business of being an adult. But he is dangerous and destructive, with the True Believer’s very purpose being the total destruction of everything that God and science—most obviously Western Civilization—has ever created. ...The Modern Liberal will invariably and, in fact, inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success.” (Evan Sayet “The Kindergarden of Eden,"

There are five  things we must understand about liberals if we are to make sense of and defend ourselves against their obvious intellectual and moral insanity.

First, they are self-indulgent narcissists who deny their own proclivity for evil.   The delusional self-conception they hold of themselves is of superior intellect and moral purity as befits gods.   No matter how obscene their language and destructive their actions, they are essentially good. Their lies for example, are 'caused' by hateful, bigoted authoritarians who prevent them from telling their own version of 'truth,' and after Adam Lanza,

' one is more to blame for the massacre of 20 first graders and six women at the Sandy Hook Elementary School than the National Rifle Association..." (Progressives Plan March On NRA In DC Monday, Evan McMorris-Santoro,, Dec. 16, 2012)

Second, liberals reject the living, supernatural God and the Fall and choose instead to embrace evolution, materialism or pantheist conceptions of an immanent god-force, and fantasies of earthly utopias. 

In his commentary, "Guns, Guns, Guns" Daniel Greenfield points out that if you reject the Genesis account and  Original Sin and instead embrace evolutionary thinking, then evil is a chicken and egg question and man is its' helpless victim:

"... Violence had no beginning, except perhaps in the Big Bang, it was always here, coded into the DNA. If people are just grown-up animals, more articulate versions of the creatures who eat each other's young, and sometimes their own young, there is as much use in wondering about the nature of evil as there is in trying to understand why a killer whale kills."  (

Third, liberalism is neo-pagan animism dressed up as science.  Like their ancient pagan counterparts, liberals  are superstitious animists who believe that man is the helpless victim of unseen forces beyond his control.  Good and bad forces are in everything from mystical genes, memes, chemicals, the Bible, Ten Commandments, prayer to God, guns, laws of nature, chance, natural selection, and neurons firing within the grey matter of all evolved humans.   As lifeless neurons and chemicals somehow produce "thoughts" then "thoughts" can be either good or bad and of course only insane liberals are  possessed of the gnosis allowing them to decide what is acceptable or not.   

Fourth, liberalism is monism.  Monism is held in common by materialism, pantheism, and spiritualism and dates back to pagan antiquity and was or is taught by all non-biblical thought systems from Buddhism to  Epicureanism, Gnosticism, Luciferian Theosophy, Satanism,  and today's  occult New Age mystical pantheism.

Monism  teaches that all that exists is "one self-creating, self-sufficient substance" an impersonal, unknowing, lifeless substance which may be thought of as atoms bumping around in the void (Epicurean materialism) or divine world soul (mystical pantheism).  Within this framework, all things are merely diverse parts of the one-substance.

Monism's greatest appeal lies in the fact that it conceptually erases the vast fixed-gulf  between the supernatural God of Revelation and the natural dimension and man, thereby bringing heaven to earth (naturalism) and allowing man to divinize himself.  Rousas  Rushdoony explains:

"... much... is known of the concept of divine kingship, the king as god, and the god as king, as the divine-human link between heaven and earth. The god-king represented man on a higher (evolved, naturally selected) scale, man ascended, and the worship of such a god....was the assertion of the continuity of heaven and earth. It was the belief that all being was one being (materialist-pantheist monism), and the god therefore was an ascended man on that scale of being. The power manifested in the political order was thus a manifestation or apprehension and seizure of divine power (through the conceptual murder of God). It represented the triumph of a man (i.e., Hegel, Marx, Darwin, Freud, Teilhard, Lenin and Hitler) and of his people (i.e., Bolsheviks, Marxists, National Socialists, Teilhardian Trans Humanists)." (Rousas Rushdoony cited in "The Antichrist," by Vincent P. Miceli, S.J., pp. 246, 247; emphasis added)

Fifth, liberals are envy-bitten hypocrites who project their own wickedness onto others, that is, onto scapegoats who they daily crucify...psychologically bully, coerce, and terrorize.  The abuse takes many forms:

 Character assassination, baseless charges of hate, bigotry, fascism, homophobia and insanity.   Malignant backbiting, merciless ridicule, cruel scoffing and scorn, and malicious accusations aimed at producing a false sense of guilt that can be manipulated for the empowerment of the wicked.

These and other evil tactics have been systematized by the wicked as mind-control techniques and used to manipulate unsuspecting Americans.

 Sixth, liberals are nihilists.  Having rejected the living God who is the only source of life, their souls are dried out and materialized.  Like the spiritually desolate Gollum, their darkened souls are turned inward and downward, making them prisoners of their own cosmically-inflated egos, seething hatred, gnawing envy, churning lusts, rapacious greed and gluttony, teeth-grinding wrath as well as of afflictions of the spirit (mind) — paranoia, obsessions, fear of the void, anxiety dreams, horrible nightmares, thoughts of murder, evil fantasies, and peculiar ideas.

Believing in nothing higher than "self," their consciences are depraved and even demonically occluded while their reason has degenerated into sophistry. They are dangerously insane revolutionaries of the void.

@Linda Kimball

Negation of Being Ends in Death of America

Most Americans in the early years of our Republic truly regarded the Constitution as a miracle, declaring that the formation and adoption of our new system of federal government represented a political achievement unprecedented in human history.

The Founders believed the Constitution was destined to bless all mankind, and that it was incumbent on their successors to preserve and defend our national charter.

In The 5000 Year Leap, author Cleon Skousen details the 28 great ideas utilized by the Founders in the formulation of our Republic. While some were derived from the Romans and others from the Anglo-Saxons, the greatest and most important ideas are Biblical, and of these the Biblical view of mankind is absolutely vital, for it’s precisely from this - the most radical view of man ever known in human history - that our liberties and rights derive.

In this view, man is an animal only in the sense that his body is of the natural realm. Spiritually, he transcends or rises above the natural realm because he is an embodied soul/spirit, and it is this part of him, his being, that is made in the spiritual image of his transcendent Creator.

Man thinks, reasons, and loves because his Creator thinks, reasons, and loves. Unique to man is free will. He can choose to lie or tell the truth; to give into bad impulses or not give into them; to seek truth, beauty and goodness, or conversely, to seek lies, ugliness, and evil. 

Divinely endowed, mankind - unlike all other creatures - is capable of self-government so long as his ability to reason is morally informed at all times. There are only two created sexes, male and female, and there is only one human race. As all men are the creatures of the living Creator, not only do they comprise a spiritual brotherhood, but they are obviously meant to be free.

All of these truths were known by the Founders to be immutable, that is, good everywhere, in all times and not subject to change.  All together, these immutable  principles were encapsulated by the Founders like this:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” – Declaration of Independence

The Founders vigorously affirm throughout their writings, said Skousen,  

..."that the foundation of all reality is the existence of the Creator, who is the designer of all things in nature and the promulgator of all the laws which govern nature. ” (A Miracle that Changed the World: The 5000 Year Leap, Principles of Freedom, p. 101)

Coming out of the Constitutional convention, a bystander asked Benjamin Franklin what sort of government had been created. “A Republic,” he responded, “if we can hold on to it.”

By this he meant that if future Americans turned away from the living Creator, the Republic would eventually collapse from chaos-induced immorality and the tyranny which follows in the wake of chaos as surely as night follows day.

Only those with their heads in the sand can deny the flagrant decadence, power-grabbing, betrayal, treachery, dysfunction, moral imbecility and increasing chaos drowning our land:

Genuine individual virtue - the stuff of which true, timeless, praiseworthy character is made,” writes John MacArthur in The Quest for Character, “has been replaced by the public ‘flaunting of decadence.’”

America is now a society that confers celebrity status and privilege on immoral, unnatural, vulgar, and outright villainous people. Being bad is ‘cool,’ but being evil is better. 

In short, a transvaluation or inversion of traditional Christian-based America has taken place. Bad is good, good is bad, the abnormal is normal the normal is abnormal, lie is truth, truth is lie, and 1+1=5.  Not only has traditional values America been turned upside-down but our Constitution and two created sexes rendered meaningless. 

 From a previous MassResistance Update:

"Dear Clara Barton Families, 'our students may notice and ask about the differences in our custodian from last year to this. If they ask at school, they will be given a simple and straightforward answer. The best thing to tell them is that our custodian used to be a man. She has changed her gender role and is now a woman.”

In the American Dictionary of the English Language, 1828 - the dictionary utilized by the founding generation- Noah Webster defines ‘gay’ as “merry, airy, jovial, and frolicksome.”    He defines a ‘person’ as, “An individual human being consisting of body and soul….possessed of a rational nature.’” Mankind is defined as, “the human race; the whole species of human beings; distinguished from all other animals by the powers of reason and speech:  ‘And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness, and let them have dominion.…Gen. 1.’”

In morally insane, secularized, pagan America,  Yahweh has been shown the door and immutable truth and morality no longer exist, allowing the words ‘gay,’ ‘mankind,’ and ‘person’ to be drained of their true meaning and replaced with depraved ‘new’ meaning. ‘Gay’ now implies that rather than two sexes, there is now a continuum of evolving ‘genders.’ No longer is there but one race of man; now there are multitudes of species and races, including a very superior one known as "liberal," one called ‘gay’ and a very evil one sometimes called "rightwing Christian fundamentalists" and at others, "Tea Partiers." 

 Darwinism having replaced Yahweh, mankind is no longer made in His spiritual image. Now he is nothing more than a chance emergence from nature; an aggregate of matter; a soulless, mindless animal controlled and driven by instinctual impulses.

Showing that pride goes before a fall, the enlightened 'superior' liberal foolishly believes he is evolved, scientific, and progressive but is really nothing more than a trousered ape given over to a debased mind,

" do those things which are not fitting; being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.” Romans 1:21-32

America, the “land of the free, home of the brave,” described by Ronald Reagan as a “shining city on a hill,” is in its death throes. Where once a principled, morally-informed, self-controlled people who firmly believed that all men are sinners carefully put into positions of power and authority only other principled, morally-informed, self-controlled people, this is no longer the case. With the exception of a rather small number of decent, moral officeholders, America is now dominated by out-of-control, self- idolizing beast-men who care for nothing but themselves and what they desire - no matter the cost to everyone else.     Beast-men hold office for one overriding reason, and that is because they mirror the out-of-control, morally unstable, intellectually-lazy, life is about having fun “electorate” who put them there.

@Linda Kimball 

Dying Seminaries, Dying Churches: the Rotten Fruit of Accommodation

In "The Bible vs. Heart," Dennis Prager writes that there is nothing -- not any religious or secular body of work -- that comes close to the Bible in forming the moral bases of Western civilization and therefore of nearly all moral progress in the world, and without the Bible,

"....there would not have been Western civilization, or Western science, or Western human rights, or the abolitionist movement, or the United States of America, the freest, most prosperous, most opportunity-giving society ever formed." (, Apr 02,  2013)

But America and the West are no longer Christian but secular (atheist) and 'feelings' have usurped the Bible.  Prager comments:

"We live in the Age of Feelings, and an entire generation of Americans has been raised to consult their heart to determine right and wrong." (ibid)

Where practical atheism and 'feelings' rule there is no God of Revelation, no transcendent Moral Law, no sin, no unchanging truth, no abiding principles and no need for salvation.  Instead, haughty self-indulgent 'feelings' 'dreams' 'wishes' 'desires' 'passions' 'intellectual pride' and 'transgression' enforced by the rebellious will reign.  But "the will" said Dostoevsky with his acute insight, "is the closest to nothing; the most assertive are closest to the most nihilistic."

The self-indulgent person, whether he calls himself Christian or not, is a rebel.  While sex, drugs, rock and roll, contempt, obscenity, seething hatred, decadence and flouting of authority and tradition characterize America's cult of nihilism,  the most common mark said Francis Schaeffer, are worn-out blue jeans.  As far back as 1960, certain Christian colleges were churning out Christian rebels,

"They knew they were, for they wore the rebel's mark---the worn-out blue jeans.  But they did not seem to notice that the blue jeans (were) the mark of accommodation---that indeed, everyone was in blue jeans"...It is so easy to be a Christian radical in the wearing of blue jeans, "when it fits in with the general climate of wearing blue jeans." (The Great Evangelical Disaster, Schaeffer, p. 98-99)

What they were saying, said Schaeffer, is "We are the 'new evangelicals,' the 'open evangelicals' who have,

"...nothing to say which stands in clear confrontation and antithesis to the surrounding culture.'    

Raggedy t-shirt, blue-jean wearing new evangelical pastor dresses down to be cool, said Dr. Randy White:

" As long as you do that, all will be well.  It helps if you’ll fancy up your hair, spending more on it than a lot of women. If you don’t have hair, shave the head and grow a goatee. These are the secrets to success. Then wear some tight- fitting designer jeans and excessively expensive hip shoes-- if you wear shoes at all.......Most of the clothing men wear in the modern pulpit today would not fit the dress code of the school classroom, the bank, the retailer, or even the local Chic-fil-a.  Pastors, it’s time to put on your big-boy pants, and get to work."  (The Modern Pastor, Dr. Randy White, worldview weekend, March 28, 2013)

Christianity has been plagued by accommodation time and again through the centuries, and in particular in the 19th and 20th centuries.    At the turn of the century Dr. Harold J. Ockenga wrote about the liberalism to which the contemporary church has been and continues accommodating itself:

"Destructive higher criticism of the Bible became the dominant approach among theologians at the close of the nineteenth century and during the early twentieth century.  When joined with naturalistic evolution, it produced liberalism...(liberalism) accommodated Christianity to modern scientific naturalism..." (Schaeffer, p. 99)

In 1907 Pope Pius X noted with alarm that liberalism was taking hold of the contemporary mind, and in that way taking possession of Western civilization, including Catholic laity and priests.   The Pope defined liberalism as "Modernism" and in 1907 declared it a synthesis of all heresy's together with its' primary doctrine evolution in the encyclical called Pascendi Dominici Gregis.

Today, not only has the Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic, mainline Protestant and much of the Evangelical church accommodated itself to evolution, which necessitates the reduction of the Genesis account to poetic language or myth thereby compromising the whole Bible, but  as eminent Catholic theologian Malachi Martin observed, the accommodation of Roman Catholicism to Modernist heresy has significantly diminished belief among Christian churchman as a whole, including prominently:

"...the Roman Catholic hierarchy and clergy (who have) relegated the very existence of Satan to the same fate as basic Roman Catholic and Christian teaching..." (Hostage to the Devil: The Possession and Exorcism of Five Contemporary Americans, Martin, p. xv)

And it is killing Protestant seminaries:

"America’s mainline Protestant seminaries are in crisis, but so far they seem to be spending more energy dodging tough choices than preparing for the future. A recent article at Inside Higher Ed describes the enrollment collapse at Luther Seminary in St. Paul. Luther is one of the most important Lutheran seminaries in the country, but its status wasn’t enough to insulate it from the forces upending seminaries everywhere. Enrollment fell off sharply, and the institution ”was running multimillion-dollar deficits, spending down its endowment and relying on loans.” (Are Seminaries Putting their Blue Days Behind Them? Walter Russell Mead, The American Interest, Apr. 2013)

Dr. Peter Jones, author of "Spirit Wars: Pagan Revival in Christian America" connects modernism (liberalism) to ancient devilish Gnosticism, saying they are kindred-spirits. He points to  Liberalism as the carrier of the occult spiritual virus (satanic revolt) into the Body of the Church where it acts to divide Christians against each other.

As the spirit of rebellion sweeps through the Evangelical church it divides Christians into two opposing camps, with traditionalists in one corner and accommodationists in the other .  Citing "Evangelicals Divided," in the April edition of First Things, Janice Crouse writes:

"First Things warns, "If evangelical theology...does not exercise the kind of intellectual humility required by Traditionalism, it will not will risk disintegrating into ever more subjectivist and individualistic sects, many of them neither evangelical nor orthodox." (Beware: Hell Exists, There's No Christianity without Sin, Death, and the Resurrection, Washington Times)

"Pride goes before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall."   Proverbs 16:18

Pride, ignorance, unfettered feelings, and weakness lend themselves to accommodation.  Accommodation leads first to irrelevance and then to death.  Throughout the West and America dying seminaries and dying churches point first of all to the rotten fruit of accommodation, and second, to the loss of faith in the living God and Christian Truth that  sustains our souls and culture.   As a consequence said Schaeffer,

"We are not only losing the church, but our entire culture as well.  We live in the post-Christian world which is under the judgment of God." (p. 90)

@Linda Kimball




Secular Liberalism's Godless Theology of 'Change'

The desire to be liberated from the constraints of Christianity was the original reason for modern liberalism’s embrace of a world defined entirely by materialism—the view that there are no immaterial entities like God of the soul, but only physical entities. This embrace of materialism began as far back as the Renaissance. And the same impulse was behind the nineteenth-century enthusiasm for scientific materialism, and it remains a staple of liberalism today." (quote from Benjamin Wiker's soon to be released book, "Worshipping the State: How Liberalism became Our State Religion,"

In his book Wiker painstakingly traces the development of contemporary secular liberalism to its roots, thereby revealing that the liberals in ascendancy in America today are,

"....the intellectual heirs of a way of thinking that from the beginning has been characterized by a desire to be free from the burden of Christianity...As a rebellion against Christianity, its negative goal defined its positive form: the desire to remove the church and replace it with the state gave liberalism its structure, beliefs, and goals." (ibid)

Though the seeds of secular liberalism were sown during the Renaissance, it was the growth of natural science in the 17th century that allowed it to blossom into faith in both sovereign human reason and scientific progress. But with English philosopher David Hume in the latter part of the 18th century, sovereign reason finally destroyed all certain knowledge, even of the natural world, when Hume announced that no man can know absolute truth through human reason because reason is a subjective faculty:

"...which has no necessary relation with the 'facts' we seek to know.  It is limited to tracing the relations of our ideas, which themselves are already twice removed from 'reality.'  And our senses are equally subjective, for they can never know the 'thing in itself,' but only an image of it..." ("Genesis, Creation and Early Man," Fr. Seraphim Rose, p. 538)

The faculties of the human intellect have been corrupted since the fall and of necessity must be submitted to the higher things of God or fall into madness.

Russian philosopher Ivan V. Kireyevsky foresaw that sovereign reason would unleash unceasing criticism of truth, morality, Revelation, prophecy, miracles, religion, and ultimately of reason itself, thus it would inevitably devour itself. (ibid, p. 537)

When corrupted human reason becomes the standard of truth, knowledge and right and wrong, as it is throughout the West and America, in its madness it ultimately results in a theater of the absurd in which there is neither up nor down, male nor female, right nor wrong, true nor false, normal nor abnormal.

The loss of certainty however, did not stop the progressive rebellion against God but rather spurred it to progressively absorb, transform and secularize God's Revelation to man together with Christian doctrine and teaching.  So for example, as a 'scientific law of progress,' Darwin's theory of evolution was not only used to justify the rebellion but to supplant the Genesis account of creation ex nihilo, or  special creation as seculars prefer to say:

"Belief in evolution is...exactly parallel to belief in special creation---both are concepts which believers know to be true but neither...has been capable of proof."  (British evolutionary biologist Prof. L. Harrison Matthews, cited by Fr. Seraphim Rose, p. 541)

Another example revolves around the doctrine of God's grace.  Christianity teaches that God's grace is open to all, thus all men may share in the perfection of holiness that is only fully produced in the supernatural Kingdom of God (heaven) outside of the time/space (energy and matter) dimension.   But in its' madness secular liberalism imagines that it's materialist science and evolutionism have shut down the supernatural dimension, brought heaven to earth, supplanted Original Sin with secular 'law' (political correctness) and God's grace with state power as the instruments for perfecting man here below.

Wiker points out that prior to the Christian doctrine of grace,

" one would have dared think about perfecting the whole human race—a few, select individuals, a small group or clan or class of society, yes, but not the whole human race. With Christianity, God’s grace... is only fully effected in the Kingdom of God... Liberalism takes the church’s salvific mission and makes it a merely political goal, one to be achieved in this world by human power alone, a heaven brought down by force to earth, where we become the authors of our own salvation.” (ibid,

A third example comes to light in the knowledge that secular liberalism has undermined the church’s responsibility to declare that something is a sin. This responsibility has been given to morally-insane secular civil authorities. It is now the right of the theocratic secular state to declare what is sin.   So for instance, while abortion and homosexuality are not sins but rather politically correct secular rights or choices, to dissent against either is to be found guilty of the politically incorrect sins of hate, intolerance, bigotry, narrow-mindedness, and homophobia.  Wiker notes that each of us now has the right to do whatever we want,

" long as it doesn’t violate the (secular) law, and we don’t bother anyone else—whatever the church might say to the contrary.” (ibid)

In the final example we see how secular liberalism has completely transformed and inverted the unchanging higher things of God:

"Thus saith the Lord: Stand ye on the ways, and see and ask for the old paths which is the good way, and walk ye in it: and you shall find refreshment for your souls. And they said: we will not walk." Jeremiah 6:16

Whereas our theocratic state exhorts us to seek change the prophet exhorts us to seek the old unchanging paths; the paths of righteousness and holiness which from of old,

"...Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and others, walked in, and follow them; and the way of salvation by Christ, which, though called a new way, Hebrews 10:20, yet is not newly found out, for it was contrived in eternity; nor newly revealed, for it was made known to Adam and Eve immediately after the fall; nor newly made use of, for all the Old Testament saints were saved by the same grace of Christ, and justified by his righteousness, and their sins pardoned through his blood, and expiated by his sacrifice, as New Testament saints; only of late, or in these last days, it has been more clearly made known; otherwise there is but one way of salvation; there never was any other, nor never will be; inquire therefore for this old path, which all true believers have trodden in..." (Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible)

Through its' primary doctrine evolution, secular liberalism has introduced a whole new scale of inverted values grounded in the first instance, on the idea that everything in nature is the fruit of a constantly evolving process of upward growth (change) rather than the original creation of God, and in the second, that in a constantly evolving (changing) world, perfection is obviously somewhere in the future.

Evolutionist J.H. Randall, Jr., comments:

"...for us the desirable is identified...with the latter end of the process of (evolutionary) development, and our terms of praise are 'modern,' 'up-to-date,' 'advanced,' 'progressive'... We had rather be modernists and progressives than sound reasoners."  (Genesis, Creations, and Early Man, pp. 542-543)

The extent to which the Western and American mind has been contaminated by secular liberalism's evolutionary thinking is seen by the fact that today's popular catch-phrases, even among Christians who ought to know better, are 'change,' 'contemporary,' and 'going forward.'   

Indeed, Obama had merely to repeatedly mutter the mantras "change" and "going forward"  to be elevated, not once but twice, to the highest office in the land.

So complete has the contamination and transformation of Western and American consciousness been that secular liberalism has successfully inverted the order of creation and reversed the direction of Biblical theism.  With creation ex nihilo virtually replaced by evolution, it is now believed, even by many Christian theologians, that men have not fallen from perfection but instead are gradually evolving upward from their ape beginnings toward greater and greater spiritual perfection. Self-perfecting man no longer needs the grace of God as the idea of evolution means he can perfect himself, and perhaps even attain god-hood.

Secular liberalism is the fruit of apostasy, thus all who step out into its' seductive vortex of change will not progress upward toward perfection but rather swirl ever downward in a spiraling vortex issuing into outer darkness.....hell.

@Linda Kimball

Evan Sayet: Retarded Liberals Actively Promote Evil

“If they weren’t so dangerous and destructive, one could smile and pat the Modern Liberal on the head and tell him how cute he is and go on about the business of being an adult. But he is dangerous and destructive, with the True Believer’s very purpose being the total destruction of everything that God and science—most obviously Western Civilization—has ever created. ...The Modern Liberal will invariably and, in fact, inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success.” (Evan Sayet “The Kindergarden of Eden,"

Ex-liberal Sayet is a long-time Hollywood insider who worked for a period as a writer for pseudo-comedian Bill Maher. He describes his former liberalism as not doctrinaire but rather the liberal default-position.  Like all liberals he knew what he needed to know: Democrats are good—Republicans are evil. Democrats like peace—Republicans like war, Democrats like air—Republicans don’t breathe.

It was the liberal reaction to 9/11 that turned Sayet away from liberalism. Its' lukewarm patriotism and even straight out anti-Americanism got Sayet to thinking, and thinking said Sayet is a dangerous thing for a liberal to do because, “The first time you think is the last time you’re a Democrat.”

Evan's talk ("Regurgitating the Apple: How The Modern Liberal Thinks") to the Heritage Foundation made it to YouTube and from there it went viral, receiving to date over 600k views and his recently published book, "The KinderGarden of Eden" is the result of his extrapolating on his theory:

 "When I say the Modern Liberal is morally and intellectually retarded at the level of the five-year-old child, it is not hyperbole: it's a diagnosis."   (         

What drives the liberal True Believer, said Sayet, is a Godless utopian vision.  In the article, "Liberal Treason Explained: “The Kindergarden of Eden” conservative writer Jim ONeill writes that John Lennon's song/anthem "Imagine" nicely sums up the liberal fantasy,

" heaven, no hell, no religion, no countries, no possessions, “nothing to kill or die for”(no right, no wrong), no past, no future (“all the people living for today”)." (ONeill, Canada Free Press, October 29, 2012)
Contemporary liberals are the ideological heirs of a rebellion against the God of Revelation and Christian theism that began as far back as the Renaissance. 

Like supernatural Christian faith, the rebellion is a movement of spirit, but its taproot and energy are in Satan, the father of lies, confusion, blasphemy and envy, the author of rebellion, and the revelator of secrets.   In affirmation, the Russian anarchist Mikhail Bakunin, one of Karl Marx's partners in the First International said:

"The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority....Socialists recognize each other by the words, "In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done....Satan (is) the eternal rebel, the first freethinker and the emancipator of worlds." (Mikhail Bakunin,"Marx & Satan," Richard Wurmbrand, p. 27)
From the beginning the nature of the rebellion has been the antithesis of the Christian faith. Whereas Christian faith is joy, patience, love, truth, humbleness, perseverance, submission in all things to the Will of God, and blessed eternal life, the rebellion is full of skepticism, destructive criticism, lies, sophistry, revulsion, burning envy, impatience, seething hatred, jealousy, rebelliousness, blasphemy, and eternal life in Hell.

Fueled by dissatisfaction with self, the world, society, and God, the rebellion devotes its' infernal energy toward "change," or as Marx put it, toward the destruction of everything that exists. It intends both the destruction of the Christian-based Old Order and the establishment of a Godless utopia because:

"The idea of God is the keynote of a perverted civilization. It must be destroyed." (Karl Marx, Marx and Satan, p. 59)

It was Bakunin who provided the concrete program of destruction followed by today's liberals:

"In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, to stir up basest passions.  Our mission is to destroy, not edify.  The passion of destruction is a creative passion." (Marx & Satan, p. 27)

Bakunin's program is an inversion and reversal of Proverbs 1:10: " My son, if sinners shall entice thee, consent not to them."

Gill's Exposition of Proverbs 1: 10 explains:

"My son, if sinners entice thee...Endeavour to seduce thee from thy parents, and draw thee aside from them, from listening to their instructions, advice, and commands; and make use of all plausible arguments to persuade thee to join with them in the sins they are addicted unto, and are continually employed in: for this is not to be understood of such who are sinners by nature, and through infirmity of the flesh, as all men are; but of notorious sinners, who are guilty of the grossest enormities, who live in sin, and give up themselves to work all manner of wickedness; sin is their trade and business, and the constant course of their lives; they are hardened, impudent, and daring, and not content to sin themselves, but do all they can to draw in others; and to preserve youth from filling into such bad company is this exhortation given in this tender, affectionate, and moving manner; next to the fear of God, and regard to parents, is this caution given to shun the company of wicked men, which young men are liable to be drawn into, and is of fatal consequence..." (

Sayet affirms that in pursuit of their Godless utopia, Hollywood and media liberals together with influential liberals situated within academia, seminaries, and political, military, and 'justice' institutions actively promote evil. Thus "sin is their trade and business, and the constant course of their lives" as is actively persuading children "to join with them in the sins they are addicted unto, and are continually employed in.."

In other words, against everyone and everything that Western civilization has historically held in high esteem, i.e., the Trinity...the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit which in Bakunin's words are the "cursed and fatal principle of authority," the Incarnation, Genesis account of creation ex nihilo, immutable truth, moral absolutes, the monogamous one-man/one-woman family together with procreation, Biblical sexual ethics, the virtues, decency, civility, neatness, order, Christian symbols and holy days, patriotism, self-defense, boundaries, limitations, and individual freedom, liberals actively promote their opposites: atheism, Darwinism, materialism, amorality, rebellion, easy divorce, abortion, alternative lifestyles, promiscuity, sexual perversion, disrespect, slovenly dress, disorder, pornography, filth, ugliness, meaninglessness and slavery (addiction to vice/sin).

Despite that some American churches truly are salt and light--a wholesome, edifying, strengthening, uplifting influence--in the religious order the rebellion has succeeded in possessing increasing numbers of Christian seminaries and churches over and across the entire denominational spectrum and where possession has not yet occurred, it has dumbed them down.  In his bestselling book, "The Marketing of Evil," David Kupelian writes:

"Christianity---the deepest, most meaningful and awe-inspiring religion ever, the magnificent force behind Western civilization, and the transcendent hope of mankind's future---has been dumbed-down (it has become) a caricature, a comic-book religion (that produces) Christians who believe they have a ticket to heaven, and nothing else really matters...They live lives of shallowness and selfisness, of petty emotions and jealousies, of gossip and escape, of ego and pride, and sometimes of gross corruption and treachery.  The worst of them are prideful, selfish, and brazen....they drive other people crazy (and away from real Christianity) with their hypocrisy.  Such people, whether in family or business relationships (or) church leaders (or) leaders of nations, sow confusion, rebellion, and suffering everywhere they go." (p. 234)

Kupelian argues that the marketing of evil succeeds because the beguiling lies, the temptations to sin we are seduced by, appeal to the hidden, selfish part of us that we want to embrace. 

We have fogotten the wisdom of Proverbs 1:10, consequently, within vast numbers of Americans---including those who call themselves Christians---liberals are successfully awakening the Devil, stirring up the basest passions, and Sayet believes this will ultimately result in widespread malevolent idiocy. 

This will surely happen unless we repent of the life of pride,

"...impatient, vain, self-serving, pleasure-seeking, egotistical, and utterly faithless part of us that has made all of us such absurdly easy targets for con men throughout the ages." (Kupelian, p. 240)

@Linda Kimball