By: DevvyJanuary 12, 2009 Â© 2008 - NewsWithViews.com
Forgive the cuss word, but is anyone else fed up with "bipartianship" politics destroying this country? I continue to get emails from the herd who say Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Obama or whatever his real name might be, is now the president and we should support him. Support a Marxist? Support an impostor who is constitutionally ineligible to serve as president? I don't think so. You see, for me the U.S. Constitution matters, as well as all the sacrifices and blood spilled on the battle field to birth this republic.
But, I guess that's the norm these days in America. Go with the flow, don't resist. Get over it. My advice to those folks: Get down on your knees and try not to let the clanking from your chains of bondage reach your cowardly heart.
This recent headline made me want to gag: Republicans on Obama: 'Like what they're hearing' "Here's some change you might find hard to believe in. Republican Congressional leaders Mitch McConnell & John Boehner say they like what they are hearing so far on Obama's economic plans.
"I think we are being listened to," McConnell told reporters. "I'm pleased with what the new president's had to say so far. I don't have any complaints about the communication at this stage." McConnell said that Republicans have consulted with economists "who would be considered more conservative" and "Each of them agreed with the president, the incoming president, that we need to do a stimulus."
More McConnell: "It's clear to me from listening to the president, the new president, that he wants to include Republican ideas and among them, that I've laid out in the last few days, are reducing the middle-class tax rate."
Obama's so called plan for the economy is another massive disaster in the making. It will throw kerosene on the bond fire already burning red hot. Stimulus package, Mitch? The U.S. Treasury is OVERDRAWN nearly $11 TRILLION dollars and you want to write more hot checks? That's the new bipartianship? In the words of a brilliant man who puts Obama's limited intelligence to shame:
"Peter Schiff, president of Euro Pacific Capital, an investment firm specializing in overseas investments, wrote in a research note the stimulus debate has not done enough to focus on the cost to taxpayers that will come from the programs. "The truth is that the only way out of this mess is less government, more savings, and increased production," Schiff wrote. "Obama's plan is a recipe for economic ruin."
Peter Schiff, like Congressman Ron Paul, Dr. Edwin Vieira and so many others, predicted years ago there would be a financial collapse as the perfect storm was building. I recommend you watch this video interview with Schiff because he tells you straight and without all the frills that the results of the global elites economic plan to be implemented by impostor president-elect Barack Hussein Obama will be devastating.
Now, Republicans like what they're hearing? Only a fool or someone completely ignorant of what's right in front of their face in 20' neon lights could "like" what they're hearing from impostor elect Obama and his Clinton retreads. Reach across the isle and work together? That's a grand idea. Walk to the edge of the cliff, boy and girls. Hold hands and jump in a bipartianship fashion.
Merrill Lynch says the rich are flocking to gold as the financial collapse picks up speed. No one said the rich were dumb, but Mark Twain hit it right on the money when he said, "Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself." Tragically, it's no laughing matter. Millions of Americans are being driven into poverty. The American dream is being stomped into the ground by Congress after Congress regardless of which party holds "power."
How about a legitimate president in office before those crackers out there in Congress get giddy over bipartianship? You can't tell me members of Congress haven't been bombarded over the past few months in one of the biggest, most sustained grass roots efforts (besides stopping the illegals invasion) I've seen in almost two decades over the cover up regarding Obama and his true citizenship. And, still, they remain silent. The electoral college votes were counted on January 8, 2009. Electoral college votes derived from massive vote fraud and herds of cattle going to the ballot box to vote for the "cool" dude.
This bipartianship rhetoric is hooey while the freight train to hyperinflation and crushing unemployment picks up speed across this country. Remember when Congressman Paul Broun accurately called Comrade Obama a Marxist? A little incoming flak and he folded.
There's an old saying, "Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas." It looks like the Republicans are going to be doing a lot of backside scratching in the upcoming days.
Several things on the Obama cover up regarding his constitutional eligibility to hold the office of president. I watched the counting of the electoral college votes on C-SPAN last Thursday. A real gag fest. The count took place. The vile Chuck Schumer proudly grinned over the final count. Dick Cheney grinned. Nancy Pelosi was trying as much as her plastic surgery would allow. One thing I did not know which has been brought to my attention: It appears Tricky Dick violated the law at the end of the counting.
Not one single member of the House or counterfeit Senate made an objection to the count nor did Dick Cheney ask if there was an objection. Is he supposed to? Words have meaning and 'shall' doesn't mean should or could:
3 USC 15 - Sec. 15. Counting electoral votes in Congress
"Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received."
Realistically, the fix was in before the session even opened. You can watch the counting of the vote here; the pertinent part of the process begins at about 30:10. Cheney does not ask if there is an objection. As I read the code, he violated the law. The only ones who care are you, me and Americans like Dr. Edwin Vieira, who said this: "Another anomalous illegality. They do not even bother to dissemble any more."
The Broe v Reed lawsuit was dismissed; see details of the lawsuit here. That case will now head to the U.S. Supreme Court. I do encourage you to take the time to read some additional facts about the Broe v Reed lawsuit, including the affidavits regarding the birth certificate on FactCheck.org; click here. It's a forgery, no question about it and the cover up continues.
While looking at a web site that contained information on Broe v Reed, I happened upon another interesting thing that others have been looking at: The Commission on Presidential Debates. They state this on their web site:
Commission on Presidential Debates
B. 2008 Nonpartisan Selection Criteria The CPD's nonpartisan criteria for selecting candidates to participate in the 2008 general election presidential debates are: 1. Evidence of Constitutional Eligibility <>
The CPD's first criterion requires satisfaction of the eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. The requirements are satisfied if the candidate:
a. is at least 35 years of age; b. is a Natural Born Citizen of the United States and a resident of the United States for fourteen years; and; c. is otherwise eligible under the Constitution.
I wonder what documentation Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro and so forth, provided to the CPD? Today I will be sending a letter to them requesting all documentation, emails, hard copy letters, forms and applications submitted by the impostor elect in order for him to participate in the debates. CPD is a private organization with the usual new world order advocates, so a Freedom of Information Act request would not be applicable here. However, Dr. Vieira has advised me should they fail to respond:
"If they, too, claim the material is somehow privileged from disclosure, the pot will really have reached the boiling point. As a 501(c)(3) they could be sued for disclosure by any contributor, who could claim his contribution was obtained by a fraudulent misrepresentation that they were actually vetting the four candidates, when in fact they were not (or were hiding what they found)."
As my readers know, my State Records Act to the Illinois State Board of Elections produced one letter from their General Counsel (addressed to the wrong person) who stated they have not one single piece of paper from Obama for his 1996 candidacy for the Illinois State Senate. In other words, what Sandvoss is saying is that a candidate for the Illinois State Senate simply got on the ballot without any notification or application to the state. The Secretary of State responded they have no documents, but the State Board of Elections does. I have already filed a complaint with the Director.
Let me see if I have this straight. Impostor president-elect, Obama, has sealed all of his records except what he can't that are a matter of public record. His sealed Occidental College records are of great interest. Obama traveled to Pakistan in the 1980s when it was illegal for U.S. Citizens to enter that country. I believe his records will show he is designated as a foreign student without U.S. citizenship. This would be a result of his mother, Stanley, and her marriage to Indonesian citizen, Lolo Soetoro. As for Harvard and Columbia, ever wonder what this guy's grades look like? I don't. He graduated without honors. The great flim-flam man has sold the American people an image; an illusion. Oh, yeah, he taught constitutional law. And, what constitution would that be? Not the U.S. Constitution by any stretch of one's imagination.
Phil Berg's lawsuit was heard in secret by the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court on January 9, 2009. The order for that should come this morning. Phil's second Distribution for Conference will be this Friday, January 16, 2009. Dr. Orly Taitz' lawsuit, Lightfoot v Bowen, is scheduled for January 23, 2009.
Will the Federal Elections Commission audit the hundreds of millions of dollars that flowed into the Messiah's election coffers? The impostor elect's handlers know the law and that is why Obama did not take "public" funds for his campaign. However, do remember that Al Capone wasn't brought down over the murder and mayhem he was responsible for, it was the tax man that got him. Regular readers to my column know I have been forwarding information to James Burrus, Chief, Election Fraud Division, FBI, Washington, DC with a polite request that Obama be fully investigated. Between the campaign funds which flooded in from overseas, Obama's shadowy dealings with crooks like Rezko and others, and his soliciting donations when he knew he was not eligible to run for the office of president, trouble is brewing for Mr. Cool.
Oh, I know. Comrade Obama is going to create two million new jobs. Dec. 6, 2008: "President-elect Barack Obama said Saturday he has asked his economic team for a recovery plan that saves or creates more than 2 million jobs, makes public buildings more energy-efficient and invests in roads and schools."
Wait! It's three million new jobs with 600,000 of them paper pushers for the government. Jan. 3, 2009: "The president-elect says he wants to "create three million new jobs" -- this is a change from a few weeks ago, when he said he wanted the plan to create OR SAVE two million jobs."
Wait! It's 3.5 million new jobs. Jan. 10, 2009: "Facing growing criticism of his economic recovery plan, President-elect Barack Obama made public Saturday a detailed analysis by his economic advisers that estimates the $775 billion plan of tax cuts and new spending would create 3.5 million jobs over the next two years."
Wait! It's 4.1 million new jobs. January 10, 2009: "President-elect Barack Obama countered critics with an analysis Saturday by his economic team showing that a program of tax cuts and spending like he's proposed would create up to 4.1 million jobs, far more than the 3 million he has insisted are needed to lift the country from recession."
All this hustling and creating jobs will be done under his "new" grand scheme called the "American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan."
There is nothing new here. It's a repeat of the massive government intervention shoved down America's throat by FDR when he created the National Recovery Act which birthed the National Recovery Administration.
Tonight on my radio show I go into what FDR did in depth. You will see that Obama is trying to take us down the same path of stupidity and financial collapse. FDR's insane policies prolonged the depression and should the impostor get sworn into office, Obama's "plan" will hit the American people like a tsunami. But, let's not forget: Republican "leadership" in Congress likes what they're hearing! See what I mean about bipartianship? Working together to implement constitutional solutions is one thing. Sleeping with the enemy is quite another.
You can hear my show tonight at 6:00 pm PST, 8:00 pm CST and 9:00 pm EST; click here to listen. Links: 1 - Legal filing 2 - Donofrio audio here and here 3 - Will Glenn Beck ask Obama the big question? Â© 2009 - NewsWithViews.com - All Rights Reserved
Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Devvy belongs to no organization. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Her web site (www.devvy.com) contains a tremendous amount of information, solutions and a vast Reading Room. Devvy's website: www.devvy.com