Caucus for America People of faith look around our country at forms of behavior now accepted and wonder how is it possible that during their own lifetime things have so dramatically deteriorated. I refer not simply to the decadent sexual realities that have become so de rigueur but to the political positions and mouthings spewing from politicians who appear to care more about our enemies than the plight of our soldiers, and profess a worldview more internationalist than American.
The elitists in media, academia, Hollywood, government â€“ especially the Courts â€“ have united to reconstitute the Founding Fathersâ€™ vision of a nation conceived in G-d We Trust, One Nation Under G-d, into a secular, hedonistic version of France and Sweden. They seem to be succeeding. Why? It is because people of faith, along with patriotic Americans, have responded tepidly and not mightily, as is required in such a battle. Many remain silent and complacent because our goodwill and naivetÃ© have stood in the way of our apprehending how those forces have had as their mission â€“ for decades â€“ the erasing of Judeo-Christian influence in American civic life and the diminution of real patriotism that is its twin.
What motivates these elitists is anti-Christianism and anti-historic Americanism. But to destroy America one must first destroy serious Protestantism, for the Judeo-Christian ethic is Americaâ€™s founding rock. And to destroy Americaâ€™s unique brand of Christianity, one must first destroy the specific American ethos that spawned it.
Secularists have been successful for, apparently, they are more zealous in their crusade than we have been in our beliefs. Their religion is left/liberalism, fanatic liberalism: todayâ€™s neo-paganism. Animated by the fervor of paganism, they have managed, through intimidation, to disparage and squelch true public religiosity while spreading â€“ missionary-like â€“ their creed of secularism, hedonism. Simply answering with love is no match for those using the stick of intimidation, weapons of mass cultural destruction (WMCDs).
We, believing and patriotic Americans, were caught off guard since we assumed that the face arrayed against Christianity and love of country would be an ugly face. But that is not so, for throughout history pagans have most often been charming neighbors. No doubt those false prophets who followed the wicked King Ahab and Jezebel dined in ancient Judeaâ€™s finest restaurants, attended the theater, dressed well, were fashionable, and comported themselves with ingratiating, amiable manners.
Look at the French! Were not the ancient pagans who extolled beauty and grace charming? The elites of their day? The face of paganism in ancient high society as well as todayâ€™s is often a pleasant one and, therefore, dangerously disarming. Rarely is it the face of Genghis Kahn. Pagan secularists did not want to kill their neighbors, rather invite them into their multi-cultural, pantheistic circles. Retain your God, they proclaimed, so long as your God assumes his pitiful position among the many gods and cultures. Continue your Americanism and Christianity here in America, the multiculturalists assert, so long as it is not dominant, simply a limp ingredient in the overriding multi-cultural edifice. It would be silly in a modern society to frame an argument in language speaking of multi-gods, pantheism. The appeal is made, therefore, in terms of multiculturalism, a code-phrase, an undertaking for diminishing the Old-Line Protestant Christianity that produced Americaâ€™s historic culture. Diversity in different segments of society is enriching. The intent, however, of professional multiculturalists is to weaken Americaâ€™s civic culture by relegating its fount, Old Testament Christianity, to a low rung; by ordering Christians of Faith to the back of the bus. As in any culture war, it is won by those who define and, therefore, command, the moral language. American liberals did this by employing terminology they knew good-willed people â€“ us â€“ would readily accept: compassion, sensitivity, inclusion, tolerance. Especially tolerance, for who wishes to be called intolerant, the deadliest of the neo-pagan seven sins. Limitless tolerance â€“ a fanatic tolerance â€“ is the very essence of paganism. It accepts everything, including decadence.
Out of a desire for appearing good â€“ and we have allowed liberals to decide who in this society is considered â€œgoodâ€ -- weâ€™ve been intimidated into accepting that which our forbearers, even non-religious, would never have accepted. Every person needs a doctrine or set of guiding principles from which to order his life. Historically, ours derived from the Old and New Testament. Rejecting the constraints demanded by the Bible, liberals created their own deities, mirroring, almost to a tee, the virtues assigned to respective pagan gods. They worship these deities with an absolutism surpassing, often, our own to our G-d.
While weâ€™ve allowed ourselves to be intimidated or embarrassed into silence, fanatic liberals have never flinched from relentless public chanting of their deities: â€œseparation of church and state,â€ â€œracism,â€ â€œnon-judgmentalismâ€ â€“ except when judging Christians of Faith. Sin and virtue in our society have been re-categorized to reflect a hierarchy of liberal values instead of the ones enunciated in the Bible and displayed by Americaâ€™s past everyday citizens. Liberals have instituted a new type of Replacement Theology, even corrupting mainline Protestant and Catholic denominations. What one hears from the pulpits today in many Jewish temples is akin to what was heard at the Temple of Zeus. It is delivered by clergymen who are modern-day versions of the ancient False Prophets.
Americaâ€™s liberals have co-opted the moral language. We are to tolerate all lifestyles, except that of the traditional family. Tolerate every â€œreligion,â€ except Evangelical Christianity. Tolerate every culture, except that of the unique American civilization. We are to have compassion for Americaâ€™s enemies but be â€œho-humâ€ about our soldiers and those beheaded by our enemies. We must show compassion to criminals while caring not how victims and society live in fear. We must be sensitive to the needs of those following Haitian witchcraft, Ramadan and Kwanzaa, but do our best to prohibit nativity scenes and crosses. Sensitivity to every group, not however to white, Christian evangelicals â€“ and their wives. We must never be racist, but bigotry is welcome when denigrating Southerners. Equality should mean no double standards, yet certain segments of society are exused for behavior that are not tolerated when done by the mainstream. In the name of anti-racism, we are asked to accept reverse racism. For example, affirmative action is forced on a society that clearly wishes to reward merit and character rather than color of skin. We must be inclusive, except when it comes to excluding principled practicing Christians of Faith who go before the Senate Judiciary Committee as nominees for Federal judgeships.
The A.C.L.U., the legal arm of pagan America, has convinced us all that George Washington fought at Valley Forge to found a nation predicated on â€œseparation of church and state.â€ Unfortunately, they have succeeded. The truth is the A.C.L.U. never believed in separation of church and state as much as using it as a hammer to dampen Christianity, its symbols, its values. The proof? In the last two years it has taken up the cause of defending Islamic â€œreligious rightsâ€ â€“ from wearing full-length burkas at community swimming pools to public school recitings from the Koran representing Islamic figures, to its silence on the issue of five-times-a-day-call- to-prayer loudspeaker announcements from mosques on public streets. The A.C.L.U. says, â€œthose are cultural expressions, not religious.â€ Yet, Santa Claus, carols, nativity scenes, and crosses in military cemeteriesâ€¦
The secular Left is purposely elevating Islam as a means to neutralize Christianity. It does so for it knows that the only way to destroy the American weâ€™ve known is by destroying the Christianity, the Judeo-Christian ethic, which created it and made it great. It realizes that what stands in its way of molding America into a libertine European country, and a socialist â€œutopiaâ€ with them at the controlling helm, is Evangelical Christianity. Liberals are today rewriting our religious heritage by now referring to "ourâ€ Judeo-Christian-Islamic heritage, as if George Washington and John Adams spoke Arabic.
When one observes the sheer absurdity of how these terms are today â€“ through political correctness â€“ employed and enforced, the phrase that comes to mind is absolutism, extremism. That liberals donâ€™t question their reckless application of those terms is a sign of their blind faith. They are the religious Left. When one beholds the mean-spiritedness behind each of these â€œvirtuesâ€ created to exclude Christians and true-blue Americanism, the intent is obviously to destroy. What began as the goal of marginalizing Christianity has evolved into a desire to vanquish, from within, John Adams's America. For the two are symbiotic.
For the neo-Communists to control all power, they know they must first topple the twin pillars. The Jews and Christians of antiquity knew paganism for what it was and fought it. We, however, have been blindsided, and suckered. We have compartmentalized our lives by retreating into the private all the while allowing the purveyors of secularism to reign over the public. We now find that the public domain controls our private realms. In the process, we have almost forfeited America, the America extant from the Pilgrims' arrival until 1963.
In our defense, we had assumed that paganism would attack the church frontally. It did not. Instead, it cleverly came through the door of government, courts, schools, our institutions. The media and press facilitated it, collaborated. We expected paganism to ride at us in blatant anti-religious garb. Instead, it arrived on a Trojan horse, a benighted political horse: liberalism.
We had thought that those living within the geographic boundaries called America were brothers, sometimes with slight differing views. Weâ€™ve learned, however, that country is more than geography but a set of core beliefs and values. Had what is being done to America today from those within its borders been enacted by people outside its shores, we would have recognized it as an invasion with intent to destroy our way of life, and liberties. We would have raised our swords.
It is time we recognize that there are battalions living in America who, as if foreigners, share nothing of our American core beliefs and values. They are not brothers. To them, we are an enemy.
Even some who hail from American blue-blood families have tossed aside their heritage for internationalism, preferring to be citizens of the world. Weâ€™ve seen this phenomenon before. During ancient Israelâ€™s Second Commonwealth, there arose (circa 185 B.C. â€“ 10 B.C.) an elitist, pagan class called Hellenists. Though some were from Judeaâ€™s ancient families, they chose internationalism over the security and indigenous culture of their people, Israel. They abandoned the G-d of Israel for the culture and gods of the world.
Internationalism has always been the enemy of Davidâ€™s God. No wonder a recent poll showed that Evangelicals are by far this nationâ€™s most patriotic. The Hebrew term for paganism, idol worship, false gods, is avodah zarah. The ancients who engaged in avodah zarah, especially the Canaanites, never worshipped the objects per se but the ideal each object represented: excessive passion, self-indulgence, lust, nature, environment, gluttony, pantheism. These idols, especially in pre-Mosaic Canaan, represented the base in man, not the Divine. The pull and power of idol worship was enormous, as is neo-paganism today.
One of the most popular and seductive gods was Baal, the Molech god. Molech, a fire god, demanded the sacrifice of a motherâ€™s child. It was a fashion of the time, just as is today the sacrifice of oneâ€™s fetus to Mother feminism: abortion at any time, for any reason, even partial birth abortion. It is the sacrament. It has become the sophisticated mantra of our day that â€œa womanâ€™s right to her own bodyâ€ constitutes enlightenment. Are we any less guilty of fashion-obsession than were the ancient fashion-conscious idol worshippers? How many in America are, like Elijah of old, willing to endure the out-casting â€œhigh societyâ€ confers on those standing up to todayâ€™s False Prophets of Liberalism?
In Islamic society, â€œsuicide bombingâ€ is the sacrifice more and more mothers are proud to offer to the god Allah. Imams have elevated the purposeful death of a womanâ€™s child for the sake of Allah as a surefire step to social standing and prominence. This, too, is Baal worship, paganism. (This itself affirms how all â€œholy booksâ€ are not equal, and that the true G-d we worship is defined not simply by being One but by His teachings. Their god is not our G-d.) The fact that many on the Left, in Europe and America, have begun establishing â€œEndowment/Charity Funds to subsidize these â€œmartyrâ€ mothers is indicative of the symbiosis developing between the Left and Islam.
You may ask, what unites these western sophisticates with Middle East barbarians? Anti-Christianity, anti-Americanism, paganism: the devotion to avodah zarah. Unfortunately, we, too, have become seduced by a form of Molechism. It is the sacrifice of our children to an absurd, neo-morality. In the name of neo-morality we ask our soldiers not to fire until Islamic terrorists first fire on them. We ask our soldiers to go house-to-house in search of terrorists instead of bombing from above. The reason being: to â€œspare the innocents.â€ Look how Israel unnecessarily forfeited 23 soldiers in Jenin by sending them house-to-house in search of Arab terrorists so that â€œinnocentsâ€ â€“ who all wished them dead â€“ could be spared from helicopter bombing from above. Many Leftist Israelis, as liberals here in America, felt a â€œspiritualâ€ joy that their own were sacrificed in behalf of the new â€œhigherâ€ morality.
While historically the U.S. tried to protect non-combatants, when did it become the goal of war to let our own truly innocent die so as to spare the enemyâ€™s â€œinnocents?â€ The morality the Bible demands for war is quite simple and direct: Do not plunder, rape and ransack for the satisfaction of lust; rather, limit warâ€™s purpose to the defense and security of country. Protecting oneâ€™s soldiers was considered paramount. Sacrificing them on the altar of â€œlook how nice we areâ€ was and is never Biblical, instead a form of self-worship. In fact, a secular newspaper editorialized how wonderful this neo-morality is for without it, the editor asks, â€œWhat gives meaning to us in this land?â€ Well, religious Christians and Jews already have meaning in their lives, thank you. Only a secularist is forced to fashion a neo-morality to supply personal meaning. Only someone who doesnâ€™t believe in his own countryâ€™s way of life and ethos would require ersatz meanings to life.
Michael Lerner, one of this countryâ€™s most vocal and influential Leftists, Hillary Clintonâ€™s former guru, announced that the United States must create a â€œPolitics of Meaning.â€ Iâ€™m certain that Rev. Pat Robertson and Rev. Jerry Falwell and Brit Hume have no such need! The ubiquitous â€œcompassionâ€ phrase has been invoked in numerous editorials to justify the unnecessary deaths of our own military men and women so as to spare Moslem â€œinnocents.â€ Only a twisted pagan view of what constitutes true compassion could make such an assertion. But even good men, religious men, have fallen sway to the new morality and definition of compassion being shoved down our throats.
The political correctness police have begun their indoctrination. It is hard to defy this brainwashing even while the heart murmurs â€œIt is not so.â€ To me, none of this is genuine compassion, rather a disregard for the sanctity of our young soldiersâ€™ lives. It places a higher value on others than our own. It is perverse internationalism, a disease infecting many in high places.
There is a 2,500-year-old Midrash (Jewish Bible commentary) that reflects on the civic nature of Biblical Sodom. It states: â€œIn Sodom good was called bad; evil was labeled worthy. Cruelty was forced on those deserving compassion, while compassion was extended to the cruel. The pleas from victims of crime went unheeded because of the â€˜rightsâ€™ granted perpetrators.â€ Sodom, as the Bible tells us, was a garden-like city and prosperous. Nonetheless, it was pagan.
While paganism boasts of â€œloving life and all its pleasures,â€ at its heart it is suicidal, dark, full of self-hate and death-wish. It is cynical, bored. Psychologists might call this â€œcompensation.â€ Todayâ€™s extreme liberalism exhibits that nihilism, imbuing within its adherents a subconscious emotion longing for the death of its own American civilization. Rarely do societies have a chance to relive the actual Biblical experience. We do! In the form of extreme liberalism, high-society paganism in America and Europe is marching to conquer Biblical values. If we wish to transmit to our children and grandchildren the religious heritage we cherish as well as the Americanism we inherited from our forefathers, we must fight now â€“ in the public domain. We cannot afford to lose. We cannot turn the other check, for our Battle is for the Soul of America. As Elijah said: â€œWho is for G-d stand up: Come.â€ Now, before it is too late!