Townhall.comJoseph C. Phillips
There is, perhaps, no better testament to how far this nation has drifted from the principles of individual liberty, free markets, and private property than that those proponents of real reform of the Social Security system are now looked upon as radicals.
Senate majority leader, Harry Reid (D-NV), running for his political life, accused his opponent, Sharron Angle, of wanting to â€œkill Social Security.â€ Of course, Harry Reid has a rather elastic definition of â€œthe truth,â€ so his attack lacks a measure of veracity. Angle has taken the position that in order to save Social Security we must stop raiding the (non-existent) lock-box and that â€œgoing forward, we need to personalize Social Security the same way that Harry Reid has a personalized account.â€ Reid has routinely characterized Angle as an extremist. Alas, Reid also suffers from the political malady known as â€œVenetian memory:â€ Recalling that which is advantageous and forgetting everything else. You see, in 1999 Harry Reid was all for â€œputting a small amount of Social Security dollars into the private sector.â€
What is also interesting is how fast Angle changed the subject. And who can blame her? Democrat warnings that Republicans want to roll the dice with the retirements of the elderly have been extremely effective. Republicans running for office must distance themselves from the topic of Social Security reform, lest they commit political suicide.
Unfortunately, such scare tactics have also scuttled any hope for finding a real solution to the very real problem of securing the financial future of the Social Security system.
This year, Social Security went into deficit; the program is paying out more than it is taking in. According to the Congressional Budget Office, this deficit will continue for the next four years, â€œwith small surpluses reappearing briefly in 2014 and 2015.â€ The report continues: â€œAfter that, demographic forces are expected to overtake the fund, as more and more baby boomers leave the work force, stop paying into the program and start collecting their benefits. At that point, outlays will exceed revenue every year, no matter how well the economy performs.â€
To this happy news, progressives shout that privatization, which really means giving private citizens ownership and control of their Social Security dollars, will lead to disaster. Such pronouncements are really an example of the old political game of saying one thing while doing another. In neighborhoods outside of Washington, D.C., this is also known as lying. Continued: http://townhall.com/columnists/JosephCPhillips/2010/10/18/social_security_reform_the_new_radicalism