Apologetics Pressby Eric Lyons, M.Min.
On September 1, 2010, James Jay Lee entered the Discovery Channel corporate headquarters building in Silver Spring, Maryland and took three hostages at gunpoint, threatening to detonate his explosive-covered body. Following a nearly four-hour standoff, police shot and killed Lee without the hostages being harmed by the explosives or gunfire.
Since James Leeâ€™s death, much has come to light about his radical environmental beliefs. Many in the mainstream media ignored or downplayed Leeâ€™s previously posted environmental rants. (Lee posted a manifesto at savetheplanet.com prior to his hostile actions on September 1; see Lee, 2010). Some may justify disregarding Leeâ€™s extreme human-hating, planet-saving views because he was delusional, or mentally ill, or simply because the global-warming, environmental movement should not be discredited on the basis of one manâ€™s extreme actions. (The mainstream media, however, do not ignore the strongly held beliefs of a â€œBible-believing,â€ delusional pro-lifer who bombs an abortion clinic.) Of course, it is true that the actions of a person should not discredit a particular belief system or religion, if the individual is acting in opposition to his or her beliefs. The fact is, however, Lee was actually taking environmental, evolutionary, atheistic beliefs to their logical conclusion.
Like a growing number of environmental, global-warming alarmists, James Lee made perfectly clear that the human population needs to be reduced drastically. In his pre-crusade post, Lee wrote about the â€œproblem of human overpopulation,â€ saying, â€œthe planet does not need humansâ€ (Lee, 2010). â€œSaving the plant means saving whatâ€™s left of the non-human Wildlife by decreasing the Human population. That means stopping the human race from breeding any more disgusting human babies!... Nothing is more important thanâ€¦saving the environment and the remaning [sic] species.â€ As if the Discovery Channel does not already heavily advocate the General Theory of Evolution, Lee emphasized how they must â€œ[t]alk about Evolutionâ€¦and Darwin until it sinks into the stupid peopleâ€™s brains...â€ (Lee, 2010).
For someone who rejects God and the Bible, but believes that humans (1) evolved by time and chance over millions of years, and (2) are currently wreaking havoc on the only known planet in the Universe that can support life, destroying human lives to save â€œMother Earthâ€ is perfectly rational. James Lee may have been mentally ill, but his flippant attitude about humanity and his willingness to end the lives of humans for the sake of Earth is perfectly consistent with atheistic, evolutionary beliefs.
At his â€œ2006 Scientist of the Yearâ€ award ceremony in Beaumont, Texas, evolutionary ecologist Eric Pianka expressed his Lee-like concerns about human overpopulation. According to attendee Forrest Mims,
Professor Pianka said the Earth as we know it will not survive without drastic measures. Then, and without presenting any data to justify this number, he asserted that the only feasible solution to saving the Earth is to reduce the population to 10 percent of the present number.... His favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the worldâ€™s population is airborne Ebola (Ebola Reston), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. Read more: http://www.apologeticspress.com/articles/240442