It Takes A Court To Define Sin?Albert Mohler
When a scandal breaks in the media, attention to previous scandals comes almost as a reflex. With accusations swirling around Atlantaâ€™s Bishop Eddie Long, the media have turned back to Ted Haggard, who, at the time of his own scandal, was pastor of New Life Church in Colorado Springs, a large independent mega-church, and president of the National Association of Evangelicals.
Haggard resigned in 2006 after a male prostitute accused him of paying for sex and buying drugs. Confronted by the media, Haggard admitted to â€œsexual immoralityâ€ with the prostitute. Just last year, he admitted also to having engaged in â€œsexual immoralityâ€ with a male volunteer at New Life Church when the man was twenty-two, echoing the accusations against Bishop Long. In recent months, Ted Haggard has started a new church in Colorado Springs.
What makes all of this so instructive are comments made in the press by both Ted Haggard and his wife, Gayle. In light of the accusations against Long, Haggard told AOL News: â€œNobodyâ€™s guilty until the court says heâ€™s guilty.â€
Nobodyâ€™s guilty until the court says heâ€™s guilty?
In a legal context, that might have some cogency, but a church cannot possibly settle for this as a principle of how to deal with accusations of sin. The church does not need the courts to define either sin or its remedy. Haggardâ€™s statement is particularly troubling given his own story.
On TVâ€™s â€œInside Edition,â€ Gayle Haggard said that Bishop Long â€œhas been a great man. â€¦ He has done wonderful things. I hope they hold onto that knowledge as they try to understand what these allegations are about, if they are indeed true.â€
The bizarre part of that statement is her encouragement to the church that it remember Bishop Long as a great man and â€œhold onto that knowledge as they try to understand what these allegations are about, if indeed they are true.â€
Well, if true, I think we all know â€œwhat these allegations are about.â€