ChronwatchBy Lee Duigon
Can you detect a pattern in these three recent news stories? Item One: While Conservative members sat as silent and inanimate as bags of laundry, an â€œexpert witnessâ€ told the Canadian Parliament that pedophilia is just another â€œsexual orientation.â€ Not willing to believe he heard it right, a member from the left-wing Bloc Quebecquois asked, â€œ[Y]ou say, if I am not mistaken, that pedophilia is a sexual orientation.â€ To which the expert replied, â€œThat is what I said.â€ In Canada, â€œsexual orientationâ€ is protected by various â€œhuman rightsâ€ laws and quasi-laws. Itâ€™s easy to imagine some extra-legal provincial â€œhuman rights commissionâ€ punishing someone for â€œdiscriminationâ€ against pedophiles.
Item Two: The High Court of the United Kingdom has ruled that Christians are unfit to be foster parents. Why? You guessed it--because faithful Christians object to the practice of sodomy. The judges stated that â€œthe equality provisions concerning sexual orientation should take precedenceâ€ over freedom of conscience and religion; that a city council â€œcan require positive attitudes to be demonstrated towards homosexualityâ€; and that Christian beliefs may â€œinfectâ€ children and may be â€œinimical to the interests of children.â€
Item Three: The National Education Association, Americaâ€™s biggest and most evil teachersâ€™ union, sent a special representative to tell a United Nations commission that â€œOral sex, masturbation, and orgasm need to be taught in education.â€ And the younger, the better. This genius, whose name is Diane Schneider, told the U.N. that â€œcomprehensive sex educationâ€--a euphemism for indoctrinating children to behave like characters in "The Satyricon"--is â€œthe only way to combat heterosexism and gender conformity.â€ (Did you even know that â€œgender conformityâ€ is a problem to be combated?) She recommended that parents not be allowed anymore to opt their children out of such programs. â€œGender identity expression and sexual orientation are a spectrum,â€ she said, adding that persons opposed to homosexuality â€œare stuck in a binary box that religion and family create.â€ No one can blame the NEA for not doing everything humanly possible to estrange children from religion and family.
Where does one even begin? In the Canadian Parliament, the expert witness said a sexual fixation on small children is â€œequivalent to a sexual orientation just like another individual may be grappling with heterosexuality or even homosexuality.â€ Grappling with heterosexuality? What planet is he on? (How many people do you know who are â€œgrapplingâ€ with their heterosexuality?)
Hey, hereâ€™s a great idea! Letâ€™s have our Western countries governed by legislators who can sit and listen to pure satanic drivel without flinching, and maybe even enact it into law, unless theyâ€™ve already done so without knowing it; by judges who find Christian morality â€œinimicalâ€ to children, and see in sodomy a positive virtue that must be inculcated in defenseless foster children; and by teachersâ€™ unions on a jihad against religion and the family, whose great goal in life is to train children to be total libertines.
Youâ€™d reject that if it were proposed to you as a new direction for society to take. But itâ€™s long past being a proposal. Itâ€™s what our wonderful leaders and opinion-makers are already doing. They took your silence for consent and just went ahead with it. The fact that they didnâ€™t ask you first is immaterial. Indeed, quite a few of you are being passively dragged along, not resisting in the least.
You send your children to schools staffed and controlled by the very same NEA that wants to bend your childâ€™s gender. This is not me putting words in their mouths. This is what they say they mean to do. The fact that you donâ€™t pull your children out of their schools tells them youâ€™re okay with it.
You donâ€™t elect insane, satanic judges; but you do elect the politicians who appoint them and pay them. You donâ€™t mean to elect moral imbeciles to your national legislatures; but there is never an excuse for re-electing them. This is every bit as true in the United States and Britain as it is in Canada. Go ahead--try to find a Western country that isnâ€™t trampling its Christian heritage.
It comes down to this, people.
Thus saith the LORD (and not by me, but by the prophets and the scriptures): Either turn away from these abominations, or die in them. To build your house in defiant opposition to God is to build only for destruction.
Donâ€™t say the Bible didnâ€™t warn you.