Right Side NewsJohn Whitehead
â€œIt is the responsibility of the patriot to protect his country from its government.â€â€”Thomas Paine
Those who founded this country knew quite well that every citizen must remain vigilant or freedom would be lost. This is the true nature of a patriotâ€”one who sounds the clarion call when the Constitution is under attack. If, on the other hand, the people become sheep-like, it will lead to a government of wolves. This is what we are faced with today as Congress marches in lockstep with the White House to renew the USA Patriot Act.
The Patriot Act drove a stake through the heart of the Bill of Rights, violating at least six of the ten original amendmentsâ€”the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Amendmentsâ€”and possibly the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments, as well. The Patriot Act also redefined terrorism so broadly that many non-terrorist political activities such as protest marches, demonstrations and civil disobedience were considered potential terrorist acts, thereby rendering anyone desiring to engage in protected First Amendment expressive activities as suspects of the surveillance state.
The Patriot Act justified broader domestic surveillance, the logic being that if government agents knew more about each American, they could distinguish the terrorists from law-abiding citizensâ€”no doubt an earnest impulse shared by small-town police and federal agents alike. According to Washington Post reporter Robert Oâ€™Harrow, Jr., this was a fantasy that had â€œbeen brewing in the law enforcement world for a long time.â€ And 9/11 provided the government with the perfect excuse for conducting far-reaching surveillance and collecting mountains of information on even the most law-abiding citizen.
Suddenly, for the first time in American history, federal agents and police officers were authorized to conduct black bag â€œsneak-and-peakâ€ searches of homes and offices and confiscate your personal property without first notifying you of their intent or their presence. The law also granted the FBI the right to come to your place of employment, demand your personal records and question your supervisors and fellow employees, all without notifying you; allowed the government access to your medical records, school records and practically every personal record about you; and allowed the government to secretly demand to see records of books or magazines youâ€™ve checked out in any public library and Internet sites youâ€™ve visited (at least 545 libraries received such demands in the first year following passage of the Patriot Act).
In the name of fighting terrorism, government officials were permitted to monitor religious and political institutions with no suspicion of criminal wrongdoing; prosecute librarians or keepers of any other records if they told anyone that the government had subpoenaed information related to a terror investigation; monitor conversations between attorneys and clients; search and seize Americansâ€™ papers and effects without showing probable cause; and jail Americans indefinitely without a trial, among other things. The federal government also made liberal use of its new powers, especially through the use (and abuse) of the nefarious national security letters, which allow the FBI to demand personal customer records from Internet Service Providers, financial institutions and credit companies at the mere say-so of the government agent in charge of a local FBI office and without prior court approval.
To their credit, some Americans began to protest the fact that the Patriot Act had given government agents carte blanche to investigate average Americans for what we used to call the right to free speech. Take the case of Derek Kjar who found himself under investigation after he mentioned that he did not intend to harm President Bush with anything more than a vote for John Kerry in the November 2004 presidential election. Agents from the Secret Service paid Kjar a visit, telling him that his neighbors had alerted them to a potentially threatening bumper sticker on his car. The sticker, found on a number of websites at the time, featured a black-and-white likeness of Bush with a crown tilted slightly on his head. Under the image are the words, â€œKING GEORGEâ€”OFF WITH HIS HEADâ€â€”a reference to the infamous King George of colonial days. Although the message is protected political speech, Kjar didnâ€™t know that. Kjar said the two agents visited him at his job at a dry cleaning service, where they asked him if he had any ties to terrorist groups or enjoyed reading historical accounts of assassinations. They also asked Kjar about his friends and family and wanted to know how he paid his monthly rent. The agents finally left after Kjar gave them the bumper sticker. Kjar said he feared the agents were going to â€œtake me away.â€
Kjar is far from the only American to be subjected to a cross-examination over his personal views about the government. Even so, despite the fact that more than 400 local, county and state resolutions were passed in opposition to the Patriot Act, that spirit of resistance proved to be fleeting. Once again, Americans lapsed into a somnambulant trance and turned a blind eye as Congress, at the urging of the Bush Administration, renewed several of the Patriot Actâ€™s more controversial provisions, which were set to expire, or sunset, on December 31, 2005. The Patriot Reauthorization Act (PAREA) took government intrusion into the lives of average Americans to a whole new level. For example, one â€œadministrative authorityâ€ provision within PAREA, which allows the FBI to write and approve its own search orders, represents a direct assault on the Fourth Amendmentâ€™s prohibitions against unreasonable search and seizure. By approving what critics termed â€œcarte blanche for a fishing expedition,â€ Congress empowered the FBI to conduct warrantless searches on people without having to show any evidence that they may be involved in criminal activities. This provision also lifted one of the last restrictions on special warrants for the FBIâ€”namely, that the information be related to international terrorism or foreign intelligence.