It looks like the Gaystapo is really up in arms over my recent series of articles on Ciscoâ€™s firing of Frank Turek. I can tell because Iâ€™m starting to get emails from them that are full of ALL CAPS â€“ not to mention intentional misunderstanding of the central moral and legal issues Iâ€™ve been discussing. The following, which was posted on a homosexual website and then sent to my private email address, is illustrative:
How many times does this have to be explained before people finally figure out how the freedom of speech works? The freedom of speech is NOT a freedom from consequences. Your constitutional rights are ONLY protected from GOVERNMENT intervention. Thatâ€™s it. The freedom of speech ONLY exists to protect you from the government stepping in an [sic] telling you what you can and canâ€™t say.
Private companies and private citizens are not the government.
If (Frank Turek) had been arrested for what he said then yes, itâ€™s a free speech case. If Cisco was entirely funded by tax payer dollars thus making them an extension of state or federal government then yes, it would be a free speech case. Neither occurred. It is not a free speech case.
Most companies, especially those that deal with sensitive information like Cisco, have very strict policies about how employees conduct themselves online in their free time. And your [sic] patently wrong that thereâ€™s â€œno evidence that Turekâ€™s extracurricular activities affected his work with Cisco and its employees in the leastâ€ because the initial complaint was made by someone who attended one of his seminars. An employee complained about another employee. So yesâ€¦ there is evidence that it affected Cisco employees because thatâ€™s where the complaint came from.
Sorry for getting a bit ranty but I am sick to fucking death of homophobes trying to hide behind free speech as if itâ€™s this magic stupidity shield that makes it ok to be a moron.
This is one of the rare times I agree with a member of the Gaystapo. In fact, his â€œrantyâ€ missive is right in two important respects:
1. The Frank Turek case is not about the First Amendment. That is why we have never asserted that it is about the First Amendment. It is about tolerance and the manner in which employees treat one another. Even a blind homosexual, like a blind squirrel, occasionally finds a nut â€“ although, in this case, I should probably say â€œacorn.â€
2. Private speech does have consequences. When you express yourself in the court of public opinion, people may well be angered by what you say. Consequently, they might not want to work with you. I suppose that even a broken homosexual, like a broken clock, is right twice a day.
The fact that Cisco Systems has angered many people with its speech â€“ in the form of one-sided homosexual activism â€“ is clearly exacerbating its current financial woes. In fact, Fox News is reporting that Cisco is considering slashing as many as 10,000 jobs as it struggles to recoup from recent market losses.
Furthermore, according to Bloomberg News, Cisco is mulling cutting as many as 7,000 spots by the end of August. The 10,000 figure represents one-seventh of its total workforce. Cisco, which is the worldâ€™ largest networking-equipment maker, is also providing early-retirement packages to several thousand workers. There have been no indications as to whether Cisco will consider employee stance on the issue of same-sex marriage when making the proposed workforce cuts.
Regardless, these potential job cuts come after Cisco suffered an 18% decline in fiscal third-quarter earnings and revealed plans for $1 billion in cost reductions amid a weaker-than-expected outlook for the current quarter. This significant decline coincided with the public controversy concerning the Turek firing â€“ a quarter during which CEO John Chambers received thousands of letters of protest concerning Ciscoâ€™s policies of inclusion and diversity. The companyâ€™s shares have declined 23.7% year-to-date and lost nearly one-third of their value over the past 52 weeks. Yet there is no indication whether Cisco will now take time off from firing Christians for their religious beliefs and instead devote their time to regaining the confidence of their shareholders.
Iâ€™m sorry for getting a bit ranty but I am sick to death of the Gaystapo trying to hide behind free speech. Itâ€™s not a magic stupidity shield that makes it okay to function as a company full of sanctimonious hypocrites. No one wants to do business with a company like that. And itâ€™s not really a First Amendment issue. http://townhall.com/columnists/mikeadams/2011/07/13/a_queer_and_present_danger/page/full/