Every now and then there is a lawsuit that really defines the desperation of a failing social movement. The recent decision of one of Americaâ€™s most intolerant religious organizations, American Atheists, provides a prime example. This group of anti-Christian zealots has filed a lawsuit they will surely lose. But they will suffer an even more resounding defeat in the court of public opinion. Put simply, the lawsuit will demonstrate that atheism is largely the result of emotional inferiority rather than intellectual superiority.
If you think my claims are over-stated, just read the following excerpt from their civil (actually it is quite un-civil) legal complaint:
â€œThe plaintiffs, and each of them, have suffered, are suffering, and will continue to suffer damages, both physical and emotional, from the existence of the challenged cross. Named plaintiffs have suffered, inter alia, dyspepsia, symptoms of depression, headaches, anxiety, and mental pain and anguish from the knowledge that they are made to feel officially excluded from the ranks of citizens who were directly injured by the 9/11 attack and the lack of acknowledgement of the more than 1,000 non-Christian individuals who were killed at the World Trade Center.â€
Thatâ€™s right, ladies and gentlemen, you heard it right. The American Atheists are suing over the two giant World Trade Center beams that remained standing and formed a cross at Ground Zero on 911. The cross, which gave comfort to millions, is now in a taxpayer-funded museum. And the atheists are hoping to exploit it for millions.
When I read about these allegations on the American Atheists website it made me break wind, cry, and toss and turn in bed for the next several nights. Iâ€™m just kidding. I donâ€™t get gas or get emotional when exposed to other points of view because Iâ€™m a grown man. That is why this lawsuit is so embarrassing. Almost all of the plaintiffs are grown men. They are mostly grown white men who have easy lives â€“ at least until they see a cross and start barfing and farting and crying and lying awake at night.
American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) attorney David French recently noted that anti-establishment plaintiffs have for decades simply claimed that they were â€œoffended observersâ€ of religious displays or, I would add, â€œoffended listenersâ€ to public prayers. But, according to French, federal courts are increasingly rejecting such arguments.
French also notes that anti-establishment plaintiffs have also made â€œoffended taxpayerâ€ arguments on the grounds that their tax dollars sometimes fund such displays. But federal courts are increasingly rejecting that argument, too. And that is only common sense. Every taxpayer is offended by something. Iâ€™m offended by the I.R.S.
So the American Atheists have been forced to make an argument with more substance than the simple claim that they are â€œoffended.â€ And, in all likelihood, the atheists have simply concocted all of their wild stories of physical suffering and mental anguish. In other words, these atheists are probably liars rather than mere sissies. But the atheists donâ€™t have to worry about the eternal consequences of lying. They reject the Ten Commandments. Hell, they even reject eternity!
Speaking of rejection, the American Atheistsâ€™ lawsuit should be rejected in the courts of law and in the court of public opinion. Christians should reject these atheists because our nation was indeed founded on Christian principles. Among those principles is the notion of religious tolerance â€“ the idea that we should be tolerant of atheists who do not share our views. But that does not mean Christians must retreat from the public square because atheists claim that we make them sick to their stomachs â€“ figuratively or literally. That would amount to rewarding intolerance.
Secularists should also reject the claims of the American Atheists. And they should do it with equal enthusiasm. To grant them the authority to trump speech because of their own confessed weaknesses would interfere with naturalistic evolution. It would promote the survival of our least physically and emotionally fit citizens. It would also result in the promotion of our silliest ideas.
So, in a nutshell, I think itâ€™s time for American Atheists to start carrying their own crosses. And they should do it without the help of American judges. After all, Christian tax dollars help fund their salaries. And that offends some of us. http://townhall.com/columnists/mikeadams/2011/08/01/dyspepsia_and_american_atheism/page/full/