Old Thinker News Old-Thinker News | August 10, 2011
By Daniel Taylor
An era of â€œAbsolute totalitarian global control,â€ an â€œAge of Transitionsâ€; The mysterious â€œSingularity.â€ It has been written that â€œWe can no more imagine the political order of this new world than a group of chimpanzees in the forest can comprehend what goes on among humans in a nearby village.â€ We have approached the crossroads of history. The choices that we make now â€“ on every level of society â€“ will shape the road that we choose to embark upon.
As Old-Thinker News has documented, a Scientific Dictatorship is operating under national security, outside of public scrutiny.
Technocrats with access to undisclosed future technology and classified intelligence are making decisions on public policy without debate. The â€œtwo soulsâ€ of the world, one that fully embraces the untrammeled expansion of technology, and the other that holds on to â€œoutmodedâ€ ideas of faith and tradition are at odds. Fred Charles Ikle, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy under President Reagan, outlines this divide in his book Annihilation from Within.
â€œUnabomberâ€ Ted Kacynskiâ€™s attacks are a vivid example of the societal chasm that Ikle is speaking of. Just today â€œanti-tech extremistsâ€ opposed to nanotechnology sent letter bombs to academics in Mexico. According to Mexico State Attorney General Alfredo Castillo, â€œThe ITS is a movement that, in accordance with its ideals, opposes any development of neo- or nanotechnology anywhere in the world, and they are linked to attacks in several different countries of Europe, including Spain and France.â€
C. Dale Walton, writing in Geopolitics and the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century, states that countries which hold on to ethical systems which hold back development of revolutionary technologies will lose strategic ground.
Globalization is expanding in lock step with the technological revolution, yet another issue sparking opposition from around the world. In truth, the elites constructing this global system have anticipated violent resistance, and have actively enabled â€“ and staged â€“ such violence. Out of chaos emerges greater control. In the words of H. G. Wells, writing in his 1940 book The New World Order,
â€œâ€¦when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people â€¦ will hate the new world order, be rendered unhappy by the frustration of their passions and ambitions through its advent and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontentsâ€¦â€
The recent Norway terror attacks were held up by the media as an example of an extremist response to increasing immigration. The Wall Street Journal, reporting on the massive unrest in the U.K., admitted that globalization has played a key role in creating the circumstances leading up to the present riots. The article also admits that the artificial booms in housing were created as a smokescreen for bankers to engage in massive looting, giving a sense of false prosperity to the new middle class. As reported,
â€œThe middle classes only tolerated this,â€ Albert Edwards of Societe Generale notes, â€œbecause central bankers created housing booms to keep the impoverished middle classes borrowing and spending to give them the illusion of prosperity and stop them from revolting.â€
The crossroads are indeed upon us. Every indicator from all branches of society are pointing to more unrest in response to a variety of issues that will touch the lives of everyone on the planet. As violent acts are committed or staged by the establishment, more people will demand greater and greater government control in the name of protection from the revolutionaries.