Free Republic Because organ donors are often alive when their organs are harvested, the medical community should not require donors to be declared dead, but instead adopt more â€œhonestâ€ moral criteria that allow the harvesting of organs from â€œdyingâ€ or â€œseverely injuredâ€ patients, with proper consent, three leading experts have argued.
This approach, they say, would avoid the â€œpseudo-objectiveâ€ claim that a donor is â€œreally dead,â€ which is often based upon purely ideological definitions of death designed to expand the organ donor pool, and would allow organ harvesters to be more honest with the public, as well as ensure that donors donâ€™t feel pain during the harvesting process.
The chilling comments were offered by Dr. Neil Lazar, director of the medical-surgical intensive care unit at Toronto General Hospital, Dr. Maxwell J. Smith of the University of Toronto, and David Rodriguez-Arias of Universidad del Pais Vasco in Spain, at a U.S. bioethics conference in October and published in a recent paper in the American Journal of Bioethics.
The authors state frankly that under current practices donors may be technically still alive when organs are harvested â€“ a necessary condition to produce healthy, living organs. Because of this, they say that protocol requiring a donorâ€™s death is â€œdangerously misleading,â€ and could overlook the well-being of the donor who may still be able to suffer during the harvesting procedure.
Read More: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2803040/posts