The Bolshevik's 'Gay-Pride' Disaster and Its Lessons for Progressives & Americans

First published in 2006, the following version of The Bolshevik's Gay-Pride Disaster has been updated for our own time, a time marked by increasing lawlessness, gang warfare, smash-and-grabbers, an epidemic of STDs, Sandusky-episodes, a multi-million dollar a year porn industry, sex-slavery, and a Progressive president who offers our nation as planetary "gay-sex" cops. Americans---we are free-falling into the same abyss into which Marxist Bolsheviks forced Orthodox Christian Russia. By its nature, Christianity is both a patriarchal (Yahweh is Father, not mother, he-she, or 'it') and hierarchal religious and philosophical worldview. Since it teaches that mankind is ‘fallen’ (has a sinful nature which is a source of evil) it requires as a consequence that moral constraints (norms, moral absolutes, social taboos) be placed on man’s sin-nature to encourage him not to act upon sinful urges, which always eventually lead to suffering and evil.

The seven great sins are: pride (self-love), envy (the cruelest of all sins), wrath, gluttony, lust, sloth, and greed. Individually and collectively, sin is the source of all manmade social ills and suffering.

Moral constraint builds self-discipline. A society in which self-discipline is viewed as a virtue is a society that has high social standards, among which are for example, honesty, patience, reliability, fidelity, loyalty, trustworthiness, and efficiency. A society characterized by high social standards such as America once was is a dynamic, productive society that values achievement and good work ethics.

While all men are sinners, the majority of mankind can and will accept moral constraints. However, into every generation are born some who absolutely will not. Even as children, these Cain-like individuals are rebellious, contemptuous, spiteful, vengeance-seeking and hateful towards authority and moral constraint, which they view as impositions upon their absolute sovereignty. As adults, they’ll see it as their mission in life to subvert and tear down all moral restraints and institutions that stand between themselves and their insatiable egos and base appetites. The working principle of this sort of person is: “I am, therefore I am entitled.”

After the collapse of the Roman Empire in 476 AD, Christianity grew and spread rapidly over and across Western and Eastern Europe. Western Europe eventually became known as Christendom.

In 1700, a group of Christendom Cain’s calling themselves Illuminati, “freethinkers” spiritists, and Progressives had begun agitating against God the Father, the Christian church, and moral constraints. In 1708, Jonathan Swift, famous for his acerbic satire, skewered freethinkers and the ‘social advantages’ they saw in the abolition of Christianity:

“I appeal to the…polite freethinker, whether in the pursuit of gratifying…passion, he hath not always felt a wonderful incitement by reflecting it was a thing forbidden…It is…proposed as a great advantage to the public that if we…discard…the Gospel, all religion will be banished forever, and consequently those grievous prejudices of education, which under the names of virtue, conscience, honour, justice, and the like…so apt to disturb the peace of human minds (and) so hard to be eradicated by right reason or freethinking, sometimes during the whole course of our lives.” Christianity is hateful because by “laying restraints on human nature (it is) the great enemy of the freedom of thought and action. “ (Gulliver’s Travels and Other Writings, Jonathan Swift, pp 449-454)

By 1825, animus against God, Christianity, and moral constraints was processed by wayward Enlightenment thinkers such as Henri de Saint Simon ,Auguste Comte and Karl Marx into systems of philosophy and warped morality. Saint Simon and Karl Marx systematized rejection of God, religion, and morality into socialism, while Comte enshrined love of self in his “Religion of Humanity,” which declared that narcissistic Promethean man was the true object of worship. Meanwhile, Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species” removed God from creation by positing that man had evolved from slime. Darwin's theory provided freethinkers and their kind with a supposedly ‘scientific’ creation story.

Thus empowered, Enlightenment philosophers brazenly declared the death of God and began to unleash the full fury of their malignant envy and wrath upon an unsuspecting Christendom, Eastern Orthodox Christian Russia, and eventually Christian-Judeo America. These civilizations were to be torn down and replaced by scientifically planned utopias while their citizens were to be spiritually ‘unmade’ and replaced by the New Man. In other words, in place of man created in the spiritual likeness of God the Father there would stand soulless machine-man, ex-ape of evolution, the New Man scientifically-engineered to serve the egoistic needs and base appetites of Promethean planners.

It was out of a crucible of massively-inflated pride and "will to force" that all variants of socialism arose: Marxism, Stalinism, Maoism, Nazism, and today’s New-Age Progressivism, which includes liberalism, feminazism, green eco-radicalism, zero-population planners, and the gay liberation movement, now evolving irapidly nto a ‘polymorphously perverse beings’ movement.

Gay activists may howl and shriek in furious denial of the connection between their faux civil rights movement and socialism, but it is gay communists themselves who have “let the cat out of the bag.”

In 1974, David Thorstadt—prominent member of the gay rights movement, a Trotskyist, and founder of NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Assoc.), co-authored with John Lauritson, a history of the early gay rights movement. The history, entitled "The Early Homosexual Rights Movement: 1864-1935" links the modern 'gay' Stonewall Rebellion to its birth in Germany, in 1864. It also details the linkage to socialism.

Leslie Feinberg, transgender lesbian activist, author, and managing editor of the communist Workers World Newspaper concurs with Thorstadt:

“The first great wave of struggle to demand sexual and gender emancipation had taken place from 1869 to 1935. It began in Germany. It was a dynamic, expanding movement that grew to be international.” (Rise of German Homosexual Emancipation Movement,

At a Berlin rally held in front of the Reichstag building in 1918, Magnus Hirschfield, socialist leader of the Homosexual Emancipation Movement, stressed why socialism was crucial to their success:

“Socialism means: solidarity…further development of society into a unified body of people.” Recalling Marx, Engel’s and other communist revolutionaries, Hirschfield said that not only in Germany, “but elsewhere too, nationalism attempted to destroy internationalism and militarism attempted to destroy socialism.” (The War to End All Wars: Pride and Struggle a Century Ago, Leslie Feinberg,

Ernst Rohm—sado-masochist homosexual, Hitler’s right-hand man, and icon for many gay activists today, was also a key player in the early gay movement. Progressive gay journalist, Johann Hari disclosed:

“Rohm was the founding father of Nazism. He believed that gay people were superior to straights and saw homosexuality as a key principle of his proposed Brave New Fascist Order. As historian Louis Snyder explains, Rohm “projected a social order in which homosexuality would be regarded as a human behavior of high repute.” (

The insane notion that psychologically, physically and socially destructive behaviors should be elevated to a level of ‘superiority’ is the fuel driving America’s gay rights movement and is at work this very moment in America's schools, universities, Hollywood, the White House and even in churches that pride themselves on being contemporary rather than orthodox.

As with Rohm, Lenin and his henchmen likewise regarded homosexuality, transgender, and lesbian as superior to the Genesis account of man, and in their narcissistic-induced stupidity they unleashed its destructive forces upon Eastern-Orthodox Christian Russia.

“Soviet sexologists in the 1920s participated in the international movement for sexual reform…a pamphlet titled “The Sexual Revolution in Russia…stated: Soviet legislation bases itself on the following principle: it declares the absolute non-interference of the State and society into sexual matters as long as nobody is injured, and no one’s interests are encroached upon. Concerning homosexuality, sodomy, and various other forms of sexual gratification, which are set down in European legislation as offenses against public morality---Soviet legislation treats these the same as so-called “natural” intercourse.” (Soviet Union in the 1920s: Scientific, not Utopian,

In the preceding statements, we can clearly see the foundational basis for today’s politically correct notions of tolerance, inclusion, privacy, diversity, consent, 'gay' marriage, adoption of children by 'gays,' and the forced-feeding of ‘gay’ perversion to American school children.

“The Bolshevik Party did not merely scrap anti-homosexual Tsarist laws. They felt it was necessary to tear down the walls that divided homosexuality…from the rest of society. Soviet Russia was by far the most significant power since the French Revolution to decriminalize male same-sex.” (People of the Moonlight in the Dawn of Revolution,

The first demands for same-sex marriage, sex reassignment surgery, and the right to ‘cross-dress’ were not made in "scientifically enlightened" post-Christian America but in Bolshevik controlled Russia, as revealed in the article, "1920s Soviet Union: Rights for Lesbians, Transgenders, Transsexuals." It was also reported that masculinized, cross-dressing lesbians were rewarded with influential positions of authority and influence throughout academia, the Red Army, and in the cultural arena: “women of the masculinized type (cross-dressing army commanders, for instance) were considered with fascination and indulgence.” (

The same article bashes “backward” Christian-Judeo America for not allowing the mainstreaming of gender-bending and perversion:

“That same year (1923) in the U.S., where anti-sodomy laws aimed to padlock closet doors, the FBI labeled anarchist Emma Goldman “the most dangerous woman in America” because of her vocal support for gay rights and other forms of social equality.”

The Bolsheviks’ fantasy of a Godless, morals free utopia, peopled by a New Man collapsed into a hellish nightmare. It was a scene straight out of Hell: while at least one-million men, women and children were being tortured and murdered, hordes of conscienceless “children of the State” were visiting havoc and crime upon cities and towns even as sex slavery, prostitution, gross debauchery and outright chaos over-spread Russia.

After years of revolution and famine the economy was severely damaged, and with the death of the family—the building block of society—both economy and culture collapsed. Too late, Communist planners realized that without the family, there is no future.

As the full-force of utopian madness fell upon Russia, revulsion and horror set in and allowed a semblance of sanity to return and in a desperate attempt to revive the family, attempts were made to rein in easy divorce, abortion and sexual debauchery. Divorce and abortion were made more difficult to acquire and by 1923, the homosexual ‘right’ to harass straight men for sex became a crime. Then in 1927, the ‘right’ to engage in sodomy was criminalized as was the right to keep “bachi”—cross-dressed, feminized boy dancers used as prostitutes. The death knell rang in 1934 when both homosexuality and prostitution were declared crimes punishable by up to 8 years in prison. (Women in the Soviet Union, Jen Pickard, Youth for International Socialism)

The Soviet Union’s birth-to-death rate continued to fall however, so by the 1980’s Gorbachev attempted yet more reforms. In a desperate bid to undo dysfunctional gender-bending and restore natural male-female relations in hope of bringing the family back to life, a course entitled, "The Ethics and Psychology of Family Life" was introduced into schools and shown on television. Its objective was to reinforce traditional roles. Teachers were urged to “train and train again, girls to be girls and boys to be boys.” (ibid)

Meanwhile, here in America the gender-bending continues full-throttle with this sort of lunacy:

University of Michigan Offers Class: How to be Gay: Male Homosexuality and Initiation. Likewise, and as was the case in Bolshevik Russia, marriage and the one-male, one-female family in America are under full attack--with intent to kill--as made clear by ‘gay’ activist Michelangelo Signorile who advises gays, “to fight for same-sex marriage…and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely…and radically alter an archaic institution.” (Source:

Shortly after President Reagan made his now famous “evil empire” speech March 8, 1983, the Soviet Union imploded.

Despite all reform efforts, Russia’s birth-to-death replacement rate continues to fall. Confronted by the chilling prospect of a ‘dead’ Russia, in a last ditch effort Vladimir Putin adopted a pro-birth policy that pays families to have at least a second child—if not more. Additionally, stay-at-home mothers receive 40% of their former salary and families with two children will receive a lump sum of $9000.

Even as a dying Russia strives mightily to restore and protect the institutions of traditional marriage and family so that it might live, America—under pressure from fantasy-believing godless Progressive utopianists—is steadfastly killing these vital life-giving institutions while simultaneously waging a war of attrition against orthodox Christianity. In the name of science, evolution, reason, progress, tolerance, inclusion, diversity, and orientation, America is casting herself into the very grave from which Russia seeks escape.

Copyright Linda Kimball 2006, updated 2011

Additional Resources: The Decline of Western Civilization: A Historical Time Line, Thomas Brewton,

The Last Empire—How it Survived So Long, Richard Pipes, Hoover Digest, 2000

While Europe Freezes in Demographic Winter World Congress of Families Seeks a Thaw, Don Feder,, 5/03/06