Three incidents in recent days tell us all we need to know about the Obama Administrationâ€™s "values."
On Dec. 1, the story broke that Bethesda, Maryland-based Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, where wounded veterans convalesce, apparently had banned visitors from bringing in Bibles or other religious items.
Walter Reed Chief of Staff C.W. Callahan issued a memo in September which said: "No religious items (i.e. Bibles, reading material, and/or artifacts) are allowed to be given away or used during a visit."
Rep. Steve King, Iowa Republican, savaged the Obama Administration on the floor of the House, saying, "The President of the United States should address this and should excoriate the people who brought about this policy and the individual who brought it about should be dismissed from the United States Military."
Yes, telling wounded soldiers and their families that their First Amendment freedoms have been suspended should be a firing offense.
Rep. King, who serves on the House Subcommittee on the Constitution, conveyed the gravity:
"The idea that these soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines that have fought to defend our Constitution, and that includes our First Amendment rights to religious liberty â€“would be denied that religious liberty when they are lying in a hospital bed recovering from wounds incurred while defending that liberty is the most bitter and offensive type of an irony that I can think of."
The policy was rescinded, but that it happened at all is a reminder of the culture that Mr. Obama has fostered in the armed forces and executive agencies, where extreme environmentalism, moral relativism, and sexual immorality have replaced traditional American values. We shouldnâ€™t really be surprised when a bureaucrat tries to bar Bibles in a U.S. military stateside hospital while other bureaucrats make sure that terrorists in Guantanamo Bay get copies of the Koran.
You almost have to feel sorry for poor Callahan, who is part of the new metrosexual military that values "diversity" more than combat readiness, so long as it doesnâ€™t include Christianity.
Recall Army Gen. George Caseyâ€™s comment after a Muslim extremist slaughtered 13 people at Fort Hood in Texas in November 2009: "Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think thatâ€™s worse."
Announcing an end to the rule, Walter Reed public affairs officer Sandy Dean said that a new policy "will be written to articulate our initial intention which was to respect religious and cultural practices of our patients." Say what?
Dean went on to insist that the policy was "in no way meant to prohibit family members from providing religious items to their loved ones at all."
But thatâ€™s exactly what it said. Time for Grouchoâ€™s defense when caught in the act: "Are you going to believe me or your lying eyes?"
Hereâ€™s more from the hapless Dean: "We appreciate Congressman King bringing this to our attention. We donâ€™t want our instructions to be ambiguous."
Ambiguity is not the problem. Itâ€™s the Obama Administrationâ€™s hostility to religion, except for Islam.
From the prevarications that helped sell Obamacare, to the lies surrounding Fast and Furious, to the periodic emissions of horse pucky about Obamaâ€™s â€œevolvingâ€ view of marriage while heâ€™s sabotaging the Defense of Marriage Act, itâ€™s getting so bad that Obama Administration spokespeople really should consider donning Groucho noses, glasses and mustaches. That would help disguise them, at least, and pave their way to enter the Witness Protection Program.
The second news item was Hillary Clintonâ€™s speech in Geneva on Dec. 6 announcing that American taxpayers will be paying for homosexual activism around the world through a $3 million Global Equality Fund. Thatâ€™s right. In a time when the United States is facing massive debt, plus a rising China and militant Islam, weâ€™re going to use foreign aid money to promote â€œgay rightsâ€ to the world. Speaking to a crowd of diplomats, many of whom do not equate race or ethnicity with volitional sexual behavior that has moral implications, Clinton urged everyone to come around to her point of view, while saying, "I come here before you with respect, understanding, and humility." (Now do what I tell you.)
Once upon a time, foreign aid was allocated as an incentive for other nations to support the interests and security of the United States. Countries did not get the money if they worked with our enemies. But now, under leftwing Democrats, foreign aid is a tool to force a radical agenda on the rest of the world, regardless of Americaâ€™s interests. Iâ€™m waiting for protest marches and cries of "cultural imperialism" from the Occupy This Squalid Dump crowd, but I think I might be waiting forever.
The third item is the Food and Drug Administration's evil idea to allow the Plan B "morning after pill" to be sold over the counter to anyone â€“ regardless of age. After the story hit the fan, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sibelius issued a directive on Dec. 7 to stop it. Plan B, which can act as an abortifacient, will continue to be sold over the counter without a prescription to anyone at least 17 years old. But 10-year-olds wonâ€™t be able to slip it onto the counter next to their gummy bears.
Is it really necessary to explain why children should not be allowed to buy a powerful drug? Should it be necessary to explain why wounded soldiers who risked their lives be allowed to receive Bibles from their families, or why many Americans donâ€™t want their country exporting the values of Sodom and Gomorrah instead of Valley Forge?
In Obamaâ€™s America, yes. http://townhall.com/columnists/robertknight/2011/12/13/obamas_war_on_truth_and_decency/page/full/