In 1947 Julian Huxley, the head of UNESCO, wrote a book titled, â€œUNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy.â€ His book was a blueprint for a "new" pagan/pantheist World Order that called for a single â€˜newâ€™ spiritualityâ€”-a mixture of materialist-animism and pantheism, Liberalized â€˜pantheisticâ€™ Christianity, Gnosticism, and other occult pantheist and pagan traditions. There would be one language and one way of thinking: â€œThe task before UNESCOâ€¦is to help the emergence of a single world culture with its own philosophy and background of ideas and with its own broad purpose.â€
Standing in the way of this new pagan/pantheist world order is supernatural Christianity, the antithesis of pagan/pantheism. Huxley described these two opposing worldviews like this:
â€œYou may categorize the two philosophies asâ€¦individualism versus collectivism or as the American versus the Russianâ€¦or as capitalism versus communism, or as Christianity versus Marxism. Can these opposites be reconciled, this antithesis be resolved in a higher synthesis? I believeâ€¦this can happenâ€¦through the inexorable dialectic of evolution.â€
When it comes to the origin of life on this earth only two possibilities exist: pagan/pantheist naturalism together with spontaneous generation and mechanical evolution or supernaturalism together with creatio ex nihilo. In the words of Nobel Prize winner George Wald, these two are the only origin of life accounts, or cosmogonies:
â€œCreation or spontaneous generation. There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved 100 years ago, but that leads us only to one other conclusion: that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds, therefore we choose to believe the impossible: that life arose spontaneously by chance.â€ (George Wald, Nobel Prize for Medicine, 1967)
Of all Christian doctrines the most difficult to understand is that of creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing). This doctrine is the complete opposite of ancient and modern evolutionary cosmogonies affirming that the universe and even the gods mechanically emerged or evolved out of a pre-existing or spontaneously generated substance such as primordial matter or the watery chaos.
The living, personal Triune God's miraculous creation has its' foundation in the fact that He spoke all things into existence from nothing. Early Church Father Irenaeus comments,
"God, in the exercise of his will and pleasure, formed all things...out of what did not previously exist."
But if there is no Triune God, then it logically follows that there is no source for life, consciousness, soul and its citadel spirit (mind, conscience, will) or for human dignity, worth, liberty, and property. Without God the Father unalienable (God-given) rights are meaningless.
If man is not God's spiritual image-bearer, then he is less than nothing, a conclusion Buddha reached long before Jesus Christ walked this earth:
"Six centuries before Jesus Christ, the Buddha already knew that if God does not exist, then the human self cannot exist either......Therefore, he deconstructed the Hindu idea of the soul. When one starts peeling the onion skin of one's psyche, he discovers that there is no solid core at the center of one's being. Your sense of self is an illusion. Reality is nonself (anatman). You don't exist. Liberation, the Buddha taught, is realizing the unreality of your existence." (The Book That Made Your World: How the Bible Created the Soul of Western Civilization, Vishal Mangalwadi, p. 6)
Centuries later, Hegel (an occult pantheist), Marx (a dialectical materialist), Darwin, Freud (a materialist), and Nietzsche (favored Eastern conceptions) among others, followed in Buddha's footsteps. God was taken away, man's soul/spirit deconstructed and lies taught as scientific fact.
With Marxist Communism it was dialectical materialism, the idea that matter spontaneously generated itself from nothing and that not only does matter think but has divine miracle-making powers. This is pagan animism disguised as the science of evolutionary naturalism.
While dialectical materialists claim that only matter exists pantheists most generally claim the opposite, that only spirit exists.
Common to both views is the idea that all that exists is natureâ€“whether impersonal thinking matter or impersonal thinking spirit.
The ultimate goal of new pagan/pantheist naturalists is the liquidation of all expressions of individual identity (i.e., individual soul, will, conscience and mind) in favor of an impersonal collective, communal consciousness.
Huxley believed the new pagan/pantheist global order could be brought about through the universal implementation of the dialectic of evolution.
The concept of dialectics has been around for a long time. In the American Dictionary of the English Language, 1828, Noah Webster defined dialectics as:
â€œThat branch of logic which teaches the rules and modes of reasoning.â€
Simply stated, dialectics refers to â€˜positionâ€™ versus â€˜oppositionâ€™ or â€˜thesisâ€™ versus â€˜antithesis,â€™ or â€˜truthâ€™ versus â€˜falsehood.â€™ By the traditional rules of conduct, if thesis is correct then it follows logically that antithesis is incorrect.
'New' pagan/pantheist dialecticians discarded the rules, turned the concept upside-down and equalized thesis and antithesis, which resulted in â€˜new truth.â€™ New truth, or sophistry, results from the merging of truth and falsehood and/or pagan/pantheism and Christianity and is found in something called â€˜synthesis,â€™ or â€˜consensus,â€™ the favored vernacular of Progressive Liberals.
The dialectic of evolution is a perfect example of what J. Budziszewski, the author of â€œWhat We Canâ€™t Not Know,â€ termed the â€œblack magic spells of imposture and unraveling.â€
In other words, the dialectic of evolution is a fraud and its purpose is to deceptively unravel the triune God's created order of being---to ultimately obliterate and then reinterpret it as essentially under man's control after the fashion of Buddha. Taking control requires the murder of the supernatural triune God together with widespread acceptance of Darwinism.
In â€œThe Altenberg 16: An ExposÃ© of the Evolution Industry," evolutionist Suzan Mazur looks at the problems surrounding evolutionary science as well as the rivalry in science regarding attempts to discover â€œthe elusive process of evolution.â€ (Desperate attempts to discover â€˜the elusive process of evolution,â€™ reviewed by Walter J. ReMine, Creation Ministries International)
Mazur describes evolutionary science as the Darwin industry and notes that it is in bed with government,
"...even as political leaders remain clueless about evolution. Thus, the public is unaware that its dollars are being squandered on funding of mediocre, middlebrow science or that its children are being intellectually starved as a result of outdated texts and unenlightened teachersâ€ (Mazur, p. ix).
Darwinism means big business, big dollars and enormous power, for as the dialectic of evolution it has been used to effect a massive spiritual transformation of consciousness, a counter-conversion of spirit away from the living triune God and toward 'new' pagan/pantheism.
With the supernatural God out of the way and man reduced to nothing, the dialectic of evolution becomes the strange fire energizing psychological weapons of mass destruction such as â€œgroup dynamicsâ€ the â€œconsensus processâ€ "sensitivity training" and "diversity training," behavior and belief modification techniques used with great success by Vietnamese communists against American POWs and by Chinese communists against dissidents and by Marxist operatives here in America:
"We have battled in America since the centuryâ€™s turn to bring to nothingâ€¦all Christian influences and we are succeeding. You must work until officials of city, county, and state will not think twice before they pounce upon religious groups as public enemies. (There must) be aâ€¦foaming hatred of religionâ€¦a belief that Christian practice is vicious, bad, insanity causing, publicly hated and intolerable.â€ (Red Communist Textbook on Psychopolitics)
â€œI think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology. Its importance has beenâ€¦increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated.â€ (Bertrand Russell)
The key psychological strategy behind these diabolical techniques is the knowledge that all individuals have an inherent fear of being alienated from the group. During sensitivity-training and diversity-training sessions, skillful change-agents (facilitators) psychologically manipulate this fear to herd selected victims toward a preplanned conclusion that induces them to compromise conscience and conviction which, for example, may lead to the abandonment of creatio ex nihilo in favor of evolution resulting in synthesis: evolutionary Christianity.
There are three steps to the dialectical consensus process. They are: â€œunfreezing the present level, moving to the new level, and freezing group life on the new level.â€
In order to speed up the unfreezing phase, Marxist communists resorted to physical torture, electro-shock â€˜therapy,â€™ and mind-altering drugs. In America, emotional pain, intimidation, and fear of shunning--of not being liked and accepted by the crowd--- are precipitated by way of vicious psychological bullying in the form of cruel ridicule, character assassination, destructive criticism, labeling, and spreading lies. Until total control has been achieved, psychological bullying will remain the preferred method.
There are four key elements necessary for a successful â€˜consensus processâ€™ operation. They are:
1. Multicultural and/or diverse groups, for instance â€˜gays,â€™ atheists, illegals, Wiccans, or Muslims, fueled by resentment and envyâ€”-necessary for causing social conflict.
2. A traditional social or cultural issue around which conflict can be created. For example, Christmas, traditional marriage, and male-female sex norms are demonized as â€˜unfair, exclusionary, insensitive, intolerant, racist, homophobic, and hurtfulâ€™ to diverse groups.
3. The dialoguing to consensus process resulting in the predetermined outcome. For example: Christmas parades successfully recast as â€œFestival of Lightsâ€ or â€œWinter Holidayâ€ parades inclusive of witches and drag queens and traditional marriage compromised by â€˜gayâ€™ unions.
Today the overwhelming success of the dialectical consensus process can be seen in the widespread embrace of Darwinism together with the popular demonization and rejection of supernatural Christianity as backward, unscientific, superstitious and unenlightened.